Proceedings of the International Workshop on Recommender Systems for Citizens 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3127325.3127330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized recommendations in e-participation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the arguments in favor and against (electronic) participative budgeting, and its benefits and limitations, there is a general agreement that nowadays the levels of citizen involvement in ePB processes are still low (Zheng and Schachter, 2017). Among the variety of elements that may influence this limited participation, several authors have highlighted issues related to the technical designs of the used e-platforms (Aragón et al, 2017;, and have proposed novel solutions in terms of content visualization and search and recommendation mechanisms (Cantador et al, 2017, to increase the citizens' engagement.…”
Section: Levels Of Discussion and Controversymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the arguments in favor and against (electronic) participative budgeting, and its benefits and limitations, there is a general agreement that nowadays the levels of citizen involvement in ePB processes are still low (Zheng and Schachter, 2017). Among the variety of elements that may influence this limited participation, several authors have highlighted issues related to the technical designs of the used e-platforms (Aragón et al, 2017;, and have proposed novel solutions in terms of content visualization and search and recommendation mechanisms (Cantador et al, 2017, to increase the citizens' engagement.…”
Section: Levels Of Discussion and Controversymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demographic and log data to address these questions are not publicly accessible for privacy regulations, but could be taken into account by the teams behind ePB platforms to enhance their reach and the overtime engagement of citizens. Among the variety of elements that may influence the levels of participation, several authors have discussed issues related to technical aspects of the used e-platforms (Aragón et al, 2017;, proposing novel solutions for content visualization, search and recommendation (Cantador et al, 2017, to increase the citizens' engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [79] author proposed user activity models for stackoverflow, Wenwo Forums & SinaWeibo to classify real experts. In [80] the model uses some basic features to compute the user weight. In this model the question-answer ratio is used to generate user weight, still, it ignores the consistency of the user.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scenario has many parallels with crowdsourcing platforms that are looking for a better matching between workers and tasks [5,7] and for a better quality of their service [2]. Examples of such tasks / contributions to recommend may consist of trusty hosts as in case of Couchsurfing 2 or companions in personal security solutions such as Companion 3 or social tasks like cleaning the garbage in the streets, helping elderly people doing grocery shopping, etc. Another example of services that can be viewed as collective good to recommend has been demonstrated in the work of Cantador et al [3] in which the authors present an study on recommending citizens' proposals on an e-participation platform that aim to address existing issues and problems in a city.…”
Section: What To Recommendmentioning
confidence: 99%