2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00013-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on safety culture

Abstract: Overviewing selected elements from the literature, this paper locates the notion of safety culture within its parent concept of organisational culture. A distinction is drawn between functionalist and interpretive perspectives on organisational culture. The terms 'culture' and 'climate' are clarified as they are typically applied to organisations and to safety. A contrast is drawn between strategic top down and data-driven bottom up approaches to human factors as an illustrative aspect of safety. A safety case… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
205
0
9

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
205
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…aviation, health care, nuclear power, military) (Cooper 2000;Guldenmund 2000;Mearns et al 2001;Pidgeon 1998;Reiman and Oedewald 2004). Although different approaches exist to theorise and measure organisational culture (Cameron and Quinn 2005;Erez and Gati 2004;Hofstede et al 1990), safety culture has become the dominant theory used to understand how cultural factors determine risk practices in industries that must balance competing demands of productivity and safety (Glendon and Stanton 2000;Nordlöf et al 2015). This is because safety culture explains how social environments directly influence risk practices and because problems in safety culture often underlie mishaps within other high-risk domains (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aviation, health care, nuclear power, military) (Cooper 2000;Guldenmund 2000;Mearns et al 2001;Pidgeon 1998;Reiman and Oedewald 2004). Although different approaches exist to theorise and measure organisational culture (Cameron and Quinn 2005;Erez and Gati 2004;Hofstede et al 1990), safety culture has become the dominant theory used to understand how cultural factors determine risk practices in industries that must balance competing demands of productivity and safety (Glendon and Stanton 2000;Nordlöf et al 2015). This is because safety culture explains how social environments directly influence risk practices and because problems in safety culture often underlie mishaps within other high-risk domains (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACSNI, 1993;Guldenmund, 2000;Zohar, 1980) and safety climate (e.g. Glendon and Stanton, 2000;Glendon and Litherland, 2001;Zohar, 1980) on issues pertaining to accidents and safety behaviour, the interplay and the relationship between the two has been insufficiently explored. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to propose an instrument to assess both organisational climate and safety climate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies used the terms ''safety culture'' and ''safety climate'' interchangeably, giving rise to many discussion papers (e.g. Glendon and Stanton, 2000;Guldenmund, 2000;Mearns and Flin, 1999;Pidgeon, 1998). This issue represented one of the main theoretical problems in this field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When organizational culture prioritizes work safety, then safety culture is present in the organization (Glendon & Stanton, 2000;Silva & Lima, 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%