2005
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic studies of linezolid and teicoplanin in the critically ill

Abstract: Linezolid dosage at 600 mg every 12 h was adequate in the critically ill without need for adjustment for renal function. For teicoplanin, further study is needed to confirm if a trough of 10 mg/L is associated with a higher rate of cure than 5 mg/L. If so, serum drug assays would be needed to ensure a therapeutic level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

8
51
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
8
51
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in the volume of distribution in critically ill patients might be caused by fluid retention due to an insufficiency of elimination pathways and/or high fluid input resulting in significant "third spacing." In accordance with the results obtained by Meagher et al, we did not observe any significant increase in minimum and maximum concentrations over time in critically ill patients (32), while Whitehouse et al (53) described a distinctive linezolid accumulation in this patient population. Compared to healthy volunteers, our study patients had a significantly decreased drug exposition expressed as AUC ss after multiple dosing (P ϭ 0.017) (data not shown) due to substantially increased clearance values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in the volume of distribution in critically ill patients might be caused by fluid retention due to an insufficiency of elimination pathways and/or high fluid input resulting in significant "third spacing." In accordance with the results obtained by Meagher et al, we did not observe any significant increase in minimum and maximum concentrations over time in critically ill patients (32), while Whitehouse et al (53) described a distinctive linezolid accumulation in this patient population. Compared to healthy volunteers, our study patients had a significantly decreased drug exposition expressed as AUC ss after multiple dosing (P ϭ 0.017) (data not shown) due to substantially increased clearance values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…After the unbound concentrations in plasma alone were analyzed, an integrated pharmacokinetic model based on plasma and ISF concentrations was developed. The use of a two-compartment model for the description of unbound linezolid pharmacokinetics in plasma is in concordance with the results of other investigations (32,53). While never before reported for linezolid, comodeling of unbound plasma and ISF concentrations with an individual compartmental PK analysis approach (12,20,38) or by using population pharmacokinetic analysis techniques (6,50,51) for other drugs has previously been described, but application is still rare.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The high variability in the values of the linezolid serum and CSF concentrations/pharmacokinetic parameters (mainly AUC and CL values) noted in this study is consistent with that reported in previous studies with critically ill patients (19,22,27) and healthy volunteers (18) and may be partly explained by interindividual variability in age and sex (11), body weight (27), and renal clearance (4). More specifically, significant correlations were found between maximum serum linezolid concentrations/CSF linezolid concentrations and body weight and, consequently, creatinine clearance in our study patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…administration of linezolid to healthy volunteers and patients with infections, i.e., 45.5 to 57.0 liters and 7.4 to 9.2 liters/h, respectively (2,18,23). Also, in a previous study with critically ill patients in an ICU (27), a comparable mean volume of distribution was found, i.e., 0.63 liter/kg, whereas the value in our study was 0.77 liter/kg. In contrast, the mean t 1/2 serum (6.5 h), steady-state C max (18.6 g/ml), and AUC serum (128.7 g · h/ml) were found to be higher in our critically ill neurosurgical patients than in healthy volunteers and patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia, i.e., 4.4 to 4.8 h, 15.1 to 17.7 g/ml, and 77.3 to 93.4 g · h/ml, respectively, with a SAPS II score of 40 Ϯ 13.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation