1993
DOI: 10.1002/bdd.2510140605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of naproxen, its metabolite O‐desmethylnaproxen, and their acyl glucuronides in humans

Abstract: The aim of this investigation was to assess the pharmacokinetics of naproxen in 10 human subjects after an oral dose of 500 mg using a direct HPLC analysis of the acyl glucuronide conjugates of naproxen and its metabolite O-desmethylnaproxen. The mean t1/2 of naproxen in 9 subjects was 24.7 +/- 6.4 h (range 16 to 36 h). The t1/2 of 7.4 as found in subject number 10 must, therefore, be regarded as an extraordinary case (p < 0.0153). Naproxen acyl glucuronide accounts for 50.8 +/- 7.32 per cent of the dose, its … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the methods reported in Table 3 have been applied in pharmacokinetic studies [26,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. However, besides interferences by co-eluting drugs, especially other NSAIDs, inter-day, intra-day CV's, and recovery data, no additional validation experiments are provided by most of the methods listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Comparison Of Current Methods With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of the methods reported in Table 3 have been applied in pharmacokinetic studies [26,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. However, besides interferences by co-eluting drugs, especially other NSAIDs, inter-day, intra-day CV's, and recovery data, no additional validation experiments are provided by most of the methods listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Comparison Of Current Methods With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until today, no liquid chromatography of naproxen has been reported with a run time of less than 5 min. More than 50% of the liquid chromatography based methods outlined in Table 3 report run times above 10 min (14 reports [21][22][23][24]27,28,31,32,35,36,38,40,44,56]). Due to UV and fluorescence detection, of which especially the former lacks additional analyte discrimination, extended run times are needed to achieve good chromatographic resolution and to avoid potential interferences from endogenous components, naproxen metabolites or co-administered drugs.…”
Section: Comparison Of Current Methods With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human plasma and urine [72] Using a Bondapak C18 reversed-phase column (15 cm × 3.9 mm ID, 10 m particle size) for plasma and a resolve spherical C18 column (15 cm × 3.9 mm ID, 5 m particle size) for urine; mobile phase containing 0.01 M potassium dihydrogen (62:38, v/v) adjusted to pH 3.0 with phosphoric acid (1:3, v/v); mixture filtered through a 0.22 m membrane filter under vacuum; flow-rate 1.5 mL min −1 ; at excitation and emission wavelengths 225 and 389 nm, respectively…”
Section: Micellar Liquid Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…drugs which use the same renal secretory pathways) and in bioequivalence studies. Several HPLC, HPLC/MS and CE methods have been developed for the determination of furosemide in biological fluids [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, employing classical HPLC columns can be rather time consuming, especially in larger pharmacokinetic studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%