Pharmacological treatment algorithms for the acute phase, agitation, and maintenance phase of first‐episode schizophrenia: Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology treatment algorithms

Self Cite

Tardive dyskinesia (TD), a movement disorder associated with antipsychotics, most frequently affects the lower face and jaw muscles, but can also affect walking, breathing and use of the hands and limbs. Knowledge of TD among physicians may be limited, and the pathophysiology of TD is poorly understood. We conducted this review to summarise the current knowledge surrounding the pathophysiology of TD and present recommendations for prevention and treatment based on a literature search and roundtable discussion attended by psychiatrists in Japan. It has been suggested that dopamine hypersensitivity, damaged gamma-aminobutyric acidergic neurons and/or increased production of reactive oxygen species may contribute to development of TD. Symptoms can profoundly affect everyday life; patients who develop TD have poorer prognoses, worse health-related quality of life, greater social withdrawal and higher mortality than patients without TD. Traditional treatment options include dietary supplements, although evidence for their effectiveness is low. Among pharmaceutical interventions, there is moderate evidence that switching to the second-generation antipsychotic clozapine, which has a lower affinity for dopamine D2 receptors than other antipsychotics, may improve symptoms. Vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT-2) inhibitors, which oppose the increased dopaminergic activity associated with prolonged antipsychotic use by interfering with dopamine uptake and storage, have the strongest evidence for efficacy. VMAT-2 inhibitors are approved in the United States for the treatment of TD, and the first VMAT-2 inhibitor was approved in Japan for this indication in March 2022. Most guidelines recommend treating TD by first reducing the dose of antipsychotics or switching to clozapine or other second-generation antipsychotics, which have a lower association with TD than first-generation antipsychotics. We recommend focusing on prevention and monitoring for TD when prescribing antipsychotics, given that TD is often irreversible. Physicians should treat with antipsychotics only when necessary and at the lowest effective dose, and frequently monitor for TD symptoms. Plain Language Summary Plain Language Summary (In Japanese) Visual Summary Visual Summary (In Japanese)

Section: Consensus Recommendations For Prevention and Treatment Of Tdmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pathophysiology, prognosis and treatment of tardive dyskinesia

Takeuchi

Mori

Tsutsumi

2022

Self Cite

“…Clozapine is the gold standard treatment for TRS, [2][3][4] reflected in national clinical guidelines. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] For some individuals, alternative treatments are required due to clinical contraindications precluding clozapine use, including clozapine discontinuation due to adverse events 12 or for those who do not wish to start clozapine due to concerns regarding side effects or the monitoring required.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

High-dose olanzapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review

Gannon

Reynolds

Mahon

et al. 2023

Background: Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) affects approximately 30% of people with schizophrenia. Clozapine is the gold standard treatment for TRS but is not always suitable, with a proportion of individuals intolerant of side effects or unable to engage in necessary blood monitoring. Given the profound impact TRS can have on those affected, alternative pharmacological approaches to care are needed. Objectives: To review the literature on the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose olanzapine (>20 mg daily) in adults with TRS. Design: This is a systematic review. Data Sources and Methods: We searched for eligible trials published prior to April 2022 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria [five randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one randomised crossover trial and four open label studies]. Data were extracted for predefined primary outcomes (efficacy, tolerability). Results: Compared with standard treatment, high-dose olanzapine was non-inferior in four RCTs, three of which used clozapine as the comparator. Clozapine was superior to high-dose olanzapine in a double-blind crossover trial. Open-label studies demonstrated tentative evidence in support of high-dose olanzapine use. It was better tolerated than clozapine and chlorpromazine in two respective RCTs, and was generally well tolerated in open-label studies. Conclusion: This evidence suggests high-dose olanzapine is superior for TRS when compared with other commonly used first- and second-generation antipsychotics, including haloperidol and risperidone. In comparison with clozapine, the data are encouraging for the use of high-dose olanzapine where clozapine use is problematic, but larger, better designed trials are needed to assess the comparative efficacy of both treatments. There is insufficient evidence to consider high-dose olanzapine equivalent to clozapine when clozapine is not contraindicated. Overall, high-dose olanzapine was well tolerated, with no serious side effects. Registration: This systematic review was preregistered with PROSPERO [CRD42022312817].

“…2 Because of its lower incidence of side effects, aripiprazole is frequently chosen as the first-line treatment for a first episode of psychosis, and it has exhibited acceptable efficacy. 3,4 Furthermore, aripiprazole augmentation was significantly more effective than monotherapy in a study. 5 However, the mean time to all-cause discontinuation for aripiprazole was…”

mentioning

confidence: 96%

Dose-response analysis of aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia in Taiwan

Tien

Huang

Liao

et al. 2022

Background: Aripiprazole is a third-generation antipsychotic agent with acceptable efficacy and a good safety profile. Previous studies have indicated the therapeutic serum concentration of aripiprazole to be 100 to 350 ng/ml; however, most of these studies examined a Western population. Patients with schizophrenia from Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital in central Taiwan were recruited to analyze the dose–response relationship of aripiprazole in the Chinese population. Objective: We aimed to investigate whether a serum concentration of aripiprazole higher than the current suggested range leads to higher response rates. Design: A prospective cohort study was designed to investigate the response rates in different studied cohorts grouped by serum concentration of aripiprazole. Data Sources and Methods: Data of 64 patients who presented to a single medical center in central Taiwan and who received therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were obtained. Serum concentrations of aripiprazole were correlated with the clinical response of patients by using the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scores. Results: The mean concentration of aripiprazole was 432.1 ± 275.1 ng/ml in the study cohort. Among the much-improved patients, the mean serum concentration of aripiprazole was 494 ± 273 ng/ml (25th–75th percentiles 264–666 ng/ml), which was higher than the current recommended therapeutic target of 100–350 ng/ml for aripiprazole. The response rate in the severe group (baseline CGI score of 6 or 7) was significantly higher than in the moderate group (baseline CGI score of 4 or 5; 86.7% versus 55.9%, p = 0.007). Conclusion: A significantly higher response rate was observed in the study cohort with serum aripiprazole concentrations over 300 ng/ml. Therefore, dosing higher than the current recommended range may potentially improve the treatment efficacy in the Chinese population. Because the serum concentration varies among patients due to multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors, TDM, especially in outpatients, is recommended if the clinical response is limited.