2009
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.17.1405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase III Study of Immediate Compared With Delayed Docetaxel After Front-Line Therapy With Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract: We observed a statistically significant improvement in PFS and a nonstatistically significant increase in OS when docetaxel was administered immediately after front-line GC, without increasing toxicity or decreasing QOL.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
238
3
14

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
238
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…in particular, 45 patients (36 males and 9 females), with a mean age of 54 years, an ECOG ≤2, stage iiiB/iV and nSCLC (28 adenocarcinomas, 11 squamous-cell carcinomas, 2 large-cell carcinomas, 4 undifferentiated carcinomas), were enrolled. They received cisplatin (30 mg/sqm, days 1-3), oral etoposide (50 mg, days [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, day 3) every 3 weeks (mPEBev regimen). Patients who achieved an objective response or stable disease received maintenance treatment with bevacizumab in combination with erlotinib until progression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in particular, 45 patients (36 males and 9 females), with a mean age of 54 years, an ECOG ≤2, stage iiiB/iV and nSCLC (28 adenocarcinomas, 11 squamous-cell carcinomas, 2 large-cell carcinomas, 4 undifferentiated carcinomas), were enrolled. They received cisplatin (30 mg/sqm, days 1-3), oral etoposide (50 mg, days [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, day 3) every 3 weeks (mPEBev regimen). Patients who achieved an objective response or stable disease received maintenance treatment with bevacizumab in combination with erlotinib until progression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the debate about maintenance therapy for advanced NSCLC had been re-ignited in recent years (Hosoe et al, 2003;Grossi et al, 2004;Chiappori et al, 2005;Pallis et al, 2006). The results of several randomized phase III studies reported showing a significant advantage of maintenance treatment in advanced NSCLC (Ciuleanu et al, 2007;Fidias et al, 2009;Cappuzzo et al, 2010). We noticed that all the trials with positive results had adopted different agents from the prior regimens as maintenance treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several randomized phase III studies have documented improvement in outcome with the use of maintenance therapy for patients with advanced stage NSCLC (Ciuleanu et al, 2007;Fidias et al, 2009;Cappuzzo et al, 2010). Despite the beneficial role reported recently for maintenance therapy, platinum-based combinations had been rarely used as the maintenance regimen given the cumulative toxicities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[69][70][71] In addition, two phase III trials indicated that patients treated with maintenance docetaxol or pemetrexed following four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy had improved progression-free survival in comparison with those on best supportive care. 72,73 Maintenance pemetrexed also improved overall survival. 73 Despite these advances, fiveyear survival in stage IIIB-IV NSCLC remains very poor, and novel targeted agents are being sought.…”
Section: Advanced Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 96%