2018
DOI: 10.1002/app.47246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase‐separated structures of random methacrylate copolymers with pendant POSS moieties

Abstract: The phase separation of random methacrylate copolymers with the pendant polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS) moieties was studied. For the random copolymers of the phenyl-substituted POSS methacrylate (PhPOSSMA) and butyl methacrylate (BMA), the layer-like phase-separated structures were obtained from the copolymers with over circa 20 wt % of PhPOSSMA after thermal annealing in the bulk. The copolymers with larger PhPOSSMA content over 40 wt % showed periodic phase-separated structure with the periodic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in the reactivity of the two comonomers can be explained by the significant difference in their molecular size and in the steric hindrance they exert [32]. Very recently, a higher reactivity of MMA and butyl methacrylate in copolymerization with methacryloxypropyl-heptaisobutyl POSS was also reported [33]. Interestingly, the opposite situation was indicated for the monomer pair, AdMA-MMA, with reactivity ratios of r AdMA = 1.25 and r MMA = 0.79 [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in the reactivity of the two comonomers can be explained by the significant difference in their molecular size and in the steric hindrance they exert [32]. Very recently, a higher reactivity of MMA and butyl methacrylate in copolymerization with methacryloxypropyl-heptaisobutyl POSS was also reported [33]. Interestingly, the opposite situation was indicated for the monomer pair, AdMA-MMA, with reactivity ratios of r AdMA = 1.25 and r MMA = 0.79 [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%