2010
DOI: 10.4038/jas.v5i1.2329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenological Development and Production Potentials of Tomato under Polyhouse Climate

Abstract: An experiment was conducted in a covered

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
7
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tomato plants are grown in shade house, or polyhouse condition recorded maximum length of the cluster. These results are in conformity with the results reported by Kang and Sindhu (2005) and Parvej et al (2010) in tomato. The weight of cluster was significantly influenced by different shading intensities (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The tomato plants are grown in shade house, or polyhouse condition recorded maximum length of the cluster. These results are in conformity with the results reported by Kang and Sindhu (2005) and Parvej et al (2010) in tomato. The weight of cluster was significantly influenced by different shading intensities (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Maximum secondary branches plant -1 was recorded in polyhouse (M 1 ) (7.98) followed by shadenet (M 2 ) (7.20) and lowest was recorded in open field conditions (M 3 ) (6.65) at 45 DAS respectively. These findings were in conformity with Megharaja (2000), Parvej et al (2010) and Harish (2011). Plant density had a highly significant effect on number of branches per plant ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Lesser number of day (34.33 and 34 days) to flower bud open was observed in the treatments soil + coirpith at 125% ETc and 100% ETc (T 7 & T 8 ) respectively, whereas the longest day was recorded in soil at 75% ETc (T 3 ) 41.66 days. Results were similar to Parvej et al[11] that the microclimate variability inside…”
supporting
confidence: 91%