Phosphorus Movement and Adsorption in a Soil Receiving Long‐Term Manure and Fertilizer Application

Eghball, Bahman; Binford, G. D.; Baltensperger, David D.

doi:10.2134/jeq1996.00472425002500060024x

Cited by 238 publications

(153 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

130

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For this reason, application of cattle manure based on P requirement and supplementation with commercial fertilizer N to achieve optimum balance of N and P availability may be advised. Unlike Eghball et al (1996) who observed significant increases in available P using N-based manure rates after 4 yr of cattle manure application, no significant increases in extractable, available P as determined by a Modified Kelowna Extraction (Qian and Schoenau 1994) were observed after 4 yr of feedlot cattle manure application in this study. Dormaar and Chang (1995) questioned the meaning of "plant available" forms of P under massive manure applications.…”

Section: Other Effects Of Feedlot Cattle Manure Applicationcontrasting

confidence: 98%

Effect of rate, frequency and incorporation of feedlot cattle manure on soil nitrogen availability, crop performance and nitrogen use efficiency in east-central Saskatchewan

Mooleki

Schoenau²,

Charles³

et al. 2004

Can. J. Soil. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

. A study was initiated in 1996 in the Black Soil zone in east-central Saskatchewan to examine soil and crop response to application of feedlot cattle manure at different application rates, frequencies and incorporation timing in a sandy loam and loam soil. Three rates of feedlot cattle manure (approx. 100, 200 and 400 kg total N ha -1 ) were applied annually and under reduced frequency application regimes. Canola (Brassica napus, L.), spring wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.), hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare, L.) and canola were seeded in spring of 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. Pre-seeding available N (0-60 cm) increased with application rates. Annual application resulted in a linear increase in grain yield with application rates but had no effect on grain N concentration. Cumulative N use efficiency was low (7-10%) with no significant difference among treatments. Single application showed significant residual fertility benefit in the second year but not in the third year except at the high rate. Incorporation timing of feedlot cattle manure had no impact on soil or crop performance. Low availability of N in feedlot cattle manure over the short-term suggests the need for high application rates or addition of supplemental N fertilizer in order to meet crop N requirements. de 1997, 1998, 1999 et 2000, ils ont ensuite semé respectivement du canola (Brassica napus L.), du blé de printemps (Triticum aestivum L.), de l'orge nue (Hordeum vulgare L.) et du canola. La quantité de N disponible avant les semis (à une profondeur de 0 à 60 cm) augmente avec le taux d'application. Lorsque l'application est annuelle, le rendement grainier augmente de manière linéaire avec le taux d'application, mais les applications annuelles n'agissent pas sur la concentration de N dans le grain. L'assimilation cumulative de N est faible (de 7 à 10 %) et ne varie pas sensiblement d'un traitement à l'autre. Le sol garde une importante fertilité résiduelle l'année immédiate suivant l'application, mais pas l'année subséquente, sauf au taux le plus élevé. Le moment de l'incorporation n'a aucune incidence sur le rendement du sol ou de la culture. La faible assimilation à court terme du N du FB laisse croire qu'on devrait recourir à un taux d'application élevé ou ajouter un engrais azoté pour satisfaire aux exigences de la culture.

show abstract

Section: Other Effects Of Feedlot Cattle Manure Applicationcontrasting

confidence: 98%

Effect of rate, frequency and incorporation of feedlot cattle manure on soil nitrogen availability, crop performance and nitrogen use efficiency in east-central Saskatchewan

Mooleki

Schoenau²,

Charles³

et al. 2004

Can. J. Soil. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Um expressivo acúmulo de P na superfície dos solos que receberam aplicação de dejetos de suínos também foi constatado em outros trabalhos Gessel et al, 2004;, bem como uma forma potencial de perda do nutriente por escoamento superficial (Berwanger, 2006) ou por lixiviação (Eghball et al, 1996;Djodjic et al, 2004 De acordo com as tabelas de interpretação propostas pela Comissão de Química e Fertilidade do Solo dos Estados de Santa Catarina e Rio Grande do Sul (CQFSRSSC, 2004), os teores de P no solo de áreas com adubação mineral, na profundidade de até 10 cm, estão dentro dos limites considerados ideais para o bom desenvolvimento de culturas anuais. Por outro lado, nas áreas com dejetos de suínos, os teores de P na mesma profundidade estão bem acima dos níveis considerados altos (18 mg dm -3 para Latossolo e Cambissolo e 24 mg dm -3 para o Neossolo), estabelecidos pela Comissão para esses solos com base no teor de argila.…”

Section: Fósforo E Potássiounclassified

Atributos químicos do solo influenciados por sucessivas aplicações de dejetos suínos em áreas agrícolas de Santa Catarina

Scherer

Nesi

Massotti

2010

Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo

104

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…cm was highest in NPK+compost treatment followed by NPK (chemical fertilizer), compost, and control. Available P concentrations were greater with manure application than without manure (Eghball et al, 1996). Long-term applications of large amounts of P fertilizer and animal manures caused an accumulation of inorganic P, resulting in an increase of the potential risk related to mobilization of inorganic P in the top 5 cm of soil (Koopmans et al, 2003).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Chemical Fertilizer and Compost on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Leaf Mineral Content, Yield and Fruit Quality of Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in Open Field

Lee¹,

Park²,

Park³

et al. 2015

Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, sustainable and environment-friendly agriculture has become an important issue all around the world, and repeated applications of mineral and/or organic fertilizer will probably affect mineral nutrient dynamics in soil in the long term but only a limited number of observations are available. This study was carried out to investigate whether there is any influence of different fertilizer management for red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivation on soil physicochemical properties, leaf mineral content, yield and fruit quality in the aspect of long-term practice in open field condition. NPK, NPK+compost, compost only, and unfertilized control plot were included in the treatments. The application of chemical fertilizer and/or compost repeated annually for 17 years from 1994 to 2011. Soil organic matter content was higher in compost treatments than in no-manure treatments. Available phosphate and the yield of red pepper were highest in NPK+compost treatment followed by NPK (chemical fertilizer), compost, and control. The results indicate that in the long term, nitrogen supply is still needed for increasing red pepper yield, but reduction in the use of chemical fertilizer could be also possible with the proper application of compost.

show abstract

Phosphorus Movement and Adsorption in a Soil Receiving Long‐Term Manure and Fertilizer Application

Cited by 238 publications

References 0 publications

Effect of rate, frequency and incorporation of feedlot cattle manure on soil nitrogen availability, crop performance and nitrogen use efficiency in east-central Saskatchewan

Effect of rate, frequency and incorporation of feedlot cattle manure on soil nitrogen availability, crop performance and nitrogen use efficiency in east-central Saskatchewan

Atributos químicos do solo influenciados por sucessivas aplicações de dejetos suínos em áreas agrícolas de Santa Catarina

Effect of Chemical Fertilizer and Compost on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Leaf Mineral Content, Yield and Fruit Quality of Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in Open Field

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About