Physical and mental component summaries score of the SF-36 in coronary patients

Soto, María; Failde, Inmaculada; Márquez, Sara; Benítez, Encarnación; Ramos, I.; Barba, Antonio; López, Fernando

doi:10.1007/pl00022069

Cited by 41 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At a group level, a T-score < 47 indicates impaired health; at an individual level, a T-score < 45 indicates impaired health in that domain. PCS and MCS are reported as T-scores and have been demonstrated to have good discriminative validity for identifying differences between clinically meaningful groups [29]. We further present Minimally important difference (MID) values from the SF-36v2 ® manual [30].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Factors influencing long-term recovery in critically ill COVID-19 survivors: A prospective multicentre cohort study

Didriksson,

Frigyesi,

Spångfors

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Long-term outcomes after critical COVID-19 have not been sufficiently studied. This study aimed to describe changes in functional outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessed at 3 and 12 months in a cohort of critically ill COVID-19 survivors. A secondary aim was to investigate factors associated with good functional outcome and HRQoL at 12 months. Methods: This prospective multicentre cohort study included critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to six intensive care units in Sweden between May 2020 and May 2021. Surviving patients were invited to face-to-face follow-ups at 3 and 12 months. A good functional outcome was a Glasgow outcome scale extended ≥7. HRQoL was assessed by the physical and mental component summary of the SF-36v2 Results: Good functional outcome was found in 93/264 (35%) and 138/217 (64%) of survivors at 3 and 12 months, respectively. There was a significant improvement in the SF-36v2 Conclusion: Between 3 and 12 months, functional outcome and physical aspects of HRQoL significantly improved, indicating continued recovery up to at least one year after critical COVID-19. Younger age, low frailty, less comorbidity, and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation were associated with better long-term outcomes. Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04974775, registered April 28, 2020. Key words: COVID-19, HRQoL, Post intensive care syndrome, intensive care, Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To investigate HRQoL, the patient-reported Short form health survey version 2 (SF-36v2 ® ) was used at 3 and 12 months [27]. This instrument is recommended as a core outcome measure evaluating ARDS survivors after hospital discharge [28] [29]. We further present Minimally important difference (MID) values from the SF-36v2 ® manual [30].…”

Section: Hrqolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors influencing long-term recovery in critically ill COVID-19 survivors: A prospective multicentre cohort study

Didriksson,

Frigyesi,

Spångfors

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The SF-36 is a validated generic instrument incorporating 8 domains and has been widely used as a QoL measure in CHD patients. [20][21][22] When the coefficient of the correlation domain of the two scales is greater than 0.4, it proves that the scale has good convergent validity, and when the coefficient of the correlation domain is higher than the coefficient of the non-correlation domain, it proves that the scale has good discriminant validity. 23 Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on the scales using structural equation modeling.…”

Section: Validity Analysismentioning

confidence: 96%

Development and Validation of the Coronary Heart Disease Scale Among the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases QLICD-CHD (V2.0) Based on Classical Test Theory and Generalizability Theory

Qiao,

Ding,

et al. 2024

IJGM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a common and frequent disease with a long and incurable course, and the quality of life of patients is severely reduced. This study was to develop and validate a quality of life scale for patients with CHD based on the Chinese context. Methods The scale QLICD-CHD (V2.0) was developed based on the QLICD-CHD (V1.0), using a programmed decision procedures. Based on the data measuring QoL 3 times before and after treatments from 189 patients with CHD, the psychometric properties of the scale were evaluated with respect to validity, reliability and responsiveness employing correlation analysis, multi-trait scaling analysis, structural equation modeling, t-test and also G-study and D-study of generalizability theory analysis. The SF-36 scale was used as the criterion to evaluate the criterion-related validity. Paired t tests were conducted to evaluate the responsiveness on each domain/facet as well as the total of the scale, with Standardized Response Mean (SRM) being calculated. Results The QLICD-CHD (V2.0) has been developed with 42 items in 4 domains. The Cronbach’s α of the general module, the specific module and the total scale were 0.91, 0.92 and 0.91 respectively. The overall score and the test-retest reliability coefficients in all domains are higher than 0.60, except for the specific module. Correlation and factor analysis confirmed good construct validity and criterion-related validity. After treatments, the overall score and score of all domains have statistically significant changes (P<0.01). The SRM of domain-level score ranges from 0.27 to 0.50. Generalizability Theory further confirm the reliability of the scale through more accurate variance component studies. Conclusion The QLICD-CHD (V2.0) could be used as a useful instrument in assessing QoL for patients with CHD, with good psychometric properties.

show abstract

A cross-sectional validation study of EQ-5D among the Malaysian adult population

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Physical and mental component summaries score of the SF-36 in coronary patients

Cited by 41 publications

References 22 publications

Factors influencing long-term recovery in critically ill COVID-19 survivors: A prospective multicentre cohort study

Factors influencing long-term recovery in critically ill COVID-19 survivors: A prospective multicentre cohort study

Development and Validation of the Coronary Heart Disease Scale Among the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases QLICD-CHD (V2.0) Based on Classical Test Theory and Generalizability Theory

A cross-sectional validation study of EQ-5D among the Malaysian adult population

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About