2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical assessment of bread destructuration during chewing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The moisture content of bread bolus varied in a small range of 61-64%, which serves as a threshold value of moistness to initiate swallowing of bread (Le Bleis et al, 2013). The baguette had a higher level of saliva impregnation (0.791 g saliva/g bread) compared to the baked bread (0.631 g saliva/g bread) and the steamed bread (0.591 g saliva/g bread) because of its thick and dry crust which required more saliva to moisten and soften.…”
Section: Group Panellists: Bread With Crustmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The moisture content of bread bolus varied in a small range of 61-64%, which serves as a threshold value of moistness to initiate swallowing of bread (Le Bleis et al, 2013). The baguette had a higher level of saliva impregnation (0.791 g saliva/g bread) compared to the baked bread (0.631 g saliva/g bread) and the steamed bread (0.591 g saliva/g bread) because of its thick and dry crust which required more saliva to moisten and soften.…”
Section: Group Panellists: Bread With Crustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanlon and Zghal (2001) provided a comprehensive review of the relationship between the cellular structure (relative density) and mechanical properties of bread crumb based on the scaling law developed by Gibson and Ashby (1997). A few studies reported the kinetics of bread destruction during oral processing in terms of saliva incorporation, particle size reduction and textural properties (Hoebler et al, 1998;Le Bleis et al, 2013;Tournier et al, 2012); however, little is known about the interconnection among bread structure, the level of oral processing required and its digestibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of bread, the understanding of food oral processing and bolus formation has been recently studied extensively. 7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In particular, the presence of a thick and dry crust on bread (i.e., a French baguette) influences the chewing force, chewing duration, salivary uptake and bolus particle size and hardness compared to crumbs alone. 10,11 Wheat breads with higher density were found to require longer mastication times than wheat bread with a lower density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Wheat breads with higher density were found to require longer mastication times than wheat bread with a lower density. 12 The structure of bread crumbs and its density and porosity impact mastication work, bolus hydration and texture. 11,15 During oral processing, breads are also subjected to enzymatic breakdown by salivary alpha-amylase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mastication reduced bread to an increasing number of small particles. Le Bleis,132 Chaunier, Della Valle, Panouillé, and Réguerre (2013) found that mastication reduced two 133 types of bread of different textures into an increasing number of small particles. However, the 134 number of small particles did not always increase with the number of masticatory cycles, 135 probably because many small particles are lost during intermediary swallows that are not 136 generally analyzed (Jalabert-Malbos, Mishellany-Dutour, .…”
Section: Oral Comminution 95mentioning
confidence: 99%