2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-021-01163-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical mapping and candidate gene prediction of branch number on the main stem in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantity and distribution of branches determine the canopy architecture, which influences light interception, lodging resistance, and seed production (Yang et al., 2021). In our study, positive results were observed, with the co‐inoculation of T. asperellum showing an 18% increase in branch number compared to that with the standard inoculation with Bradyrhizobium spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantity and distribution of branches determine the canopy architecture, which influences light interception, lodging resistance, and seed production (Yang et al., 2021). In our study, positive results were observed, with the co‐inoculation of T. asperellum showing an 18% increase in branch number compared to that with the standard inoculation with Bradyrhizobium spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic analysis of SD revealed that SD was controlled by a batch of different QTLs. Using 257 soybean accessions, generalized linear model (GLM) and enriched compressed mixed linear model (E-cMLM) revealed that satt382 (A1) and satt534 (B2) with the highest positive and negative additive effects, respectively, were associated with SD (Yang, 2011). Five SD-associated QTLs (qSD-1-1, qSD-8-1, qSD-8-2, qSD-24-1, and qSD-24-2), located on the A2, C2, and L linkage groups, with phenotypic variance explained by 8.7-17.0%, were identified using composite interval mapping (CIM) based on 165 materials from the soy01 population (Zhou et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, currently, the great challenge of the farmers is to increase the productivity of soybean. One of the alternatives found is the use of plant regulators (such as herbicides applied in subdoses) (Silva et al, 2009) in order to stop the growth in plant height and to induce lateral branches, which might lead to a greater formation of reproductive nodes and, consequently, more flowers and pods per plant (Yang et al, 2021). Plant growth regulators are synthetic chemicals with an effect on plant metabolism, so they inhibit, alter, or promote physiological and biochemical processes in plants (Nagashima et al, 2010;Silva et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%