2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical, structural, mechanical and thermal characterization of bacterial cellulose by G. hansenii NCIM 2529

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is considered that closely arranged microfibrils bind the water molecules more efficiently due to the stronger hydrogen bonding interactions, as compared to the loosely arranged microfibrils [72,73]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that more water can be retained due to the larger surface area provided by thinner and longer fibers [74]. In the present study, it was also shown that RMF exposed BC released water slightly slower and required the highest temperature to release water molecules as compared to the unexposed controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…It is considered that closely arranged microfibrils bind the water molecules more efficiently due to the stronger hydrogen bonding interactions, as compared to the loosely arranged microfibrils [72,73]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that more water can be retained due to the larger surface area provided by thinner and longer fibers [74]. In the present study, it was also shown that RMF exposed BC released water slightly slower and required the highest temperature to release water molecules as compared to the unexposed controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Gluconacetobacter sp. is a common bacterium for BC production (Nguyen and others ; Mohite and Patil ). Several studies reported different strategies to improve the yield of BC production from Gluconacetobacter hansenii (Shezad and others ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…collagen) (Saska et al, 2012) Ethyl-, propyl-, i-propyl-, nbutyl BC derivatives with better solubility in low polar solvents (Lin et al, 2013b) Improved water solubility (Geyer et al, 1994) Improved protein adsorption (Lin et al, 2015) Hydrophobizat ion of BC surface Active site for further modifications Carbon reactivity: C(6)>>C (2) (Luo et al, 2014b) Shaking conditions result in thinner and longer BC fibers (Mohite and Patil, 2014) 50% loss in fiber diameter (Grande et al, 2009a) Increased microfibril diameter (Ha et al, 2011) Composite with suitable electrical properties (Luo et al, 2014a) Scaffold with improved biocompatibility for bone regeneration (Grande et al, 2009a) Material adsorbent for heavy metals Material with high efficiency in wound healing (Wiegand et al, 2006) Promising material for wound healing therapy (Fu et al, 2014;Phisalaphong and Jatupaiboon, 2008) Composites with great antimicrobial activity ( grafting of methyl terminated octadecyltrichlorosilane (Taokaew et al, 2015) grafting of amine terminated 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (Taokaew et al, 2015) RGD peptides:  Attachment through cellulose binding modules )  Attachment through xyloglucan binding modules IKVAV peptide sequence:  Attachment through carbohydrate binding modules (Pertile et al, 2012) ɛ-Polylysine:  Penetration of a solution into the BC matrix followed by crosslinking with procyanidins (Gao et al, 2011) Poly-L-lysine hydrobromide:  Penetration of a solution into the BC matrix (Culebras et al, 2015) Macrophagestimulating protein:  Penetration of a solution into the BC matrix (Zhao et al, 2015) Silk fibroin:  Penetration of a solution into the BC matrix (Olivera Barud et al, 2015) Growth factors:  Penetration of a solution into the BC matrix Shi et al, 2012b) Collagen:  Penetration of a solution into the BC matrix Culebras et al, 2015)<...>…”
Section: Control Of Chain Lengthmentioning
confidence: 98%