Physicians' attitudes towards psycho‐oncology, perceived barriers, and psychosocial competencies: Indicators of successful implementation of adjunctive psycho‐oncological care?

Abstract

Objective: Clinical experience reveals a gap between recommended psychosocial care and actual support for psycho-oncology. Physicians are essential for managing psychosocial distress and for the successful implementation of psycho-oncology.The aim was to explore physician's attitudes towards psycho-oncology, their selfperceived barriers towards referral to psycho-oncology, and their personal psychosocial competencies in a maximum-care hospital. Method: Semistructured interviews informed the development of a questionnaire administered to a monocentric sample of 120 physicians at the University Hospital Frankfurt. The data were exploratively analysed. Results: One hundred two physicians completed the questionnaire. Physicians provided high ratings concerning the value of psycho-oncology, beliefs about its efficacy, and their personal commitment to psycho-oncology. Physicians noticed especially barriers that originated from patients themselves. They estimated their own psychosocial education and knowledge as moderate but rated their psychosocial skills and abilities as higher. Frequency of integration of psychosocial care was most strongly influenced by physicians' psychosocial competencies and their personal commitment to psycho-oncology. Integration of psycho-oncological issues occurs in 43% of patients. Conclusion: Physicians are an important indicator of successful implementation. The discrepancy between the positive evaluation and actual support for psychooncology may be explained by several factors, eg, the lack of support from clinic leaders. Patient-related barriers, most often identified by physicians, seem to be an indication of actual lack of psychosocial competencies. Physicians' psychosocial competencies positively affect the implementation of psycho-oncology. Sound knowledge of psychosocial topics may result in increased integration of psychosocial aspects into treatment. Therefore, medical training should focus more on psychosocial issues. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Additional supporting information may be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of the article. How to cite this article: Senf B, Fettel J, Demmerle C, Maiwurm P. Physicians' attitudes towards psycho-oncology, perceived barriers, and psychosocial competencies: Indicators of successful implementation of adjunctive psycho-oncological care?

Cancer patient utilisation of psychological care in Germany: The role of attitudes towards seeking help

“…Such courses could be offered on a population level as well as in a group with an increased risk of mental health problems (like cancer patients). As we also found that social norms influence positive attitudes, medical staff need to be trained in psychosocial competencies, as recently stressed (Senf, Fettel, Demmerle, & Maiwurm, ). In order to enhance positive attitudes effectively and permanently, it is therefore recommended to combine individual interventions for high‐distressed patients (e.g.…”

Factors associated with the decline of psychological support in hospitalized patients with cancer

“…Frey Nascimento et al found that additional information from a physician about psychological support did not play a role in uptake behavior whereas oncologists' recommendations for psycho‐oncological services were associated with increased uptake of these services. Similarly, Senf et al reported that physicians' personal commitment towards psycho‐oncology influences integration of psycho‐oncology in patient treatment. Thus, physicians' attitude and opinion towards psycho‐oncological care might be a key factor of patients' desire for psychological support.…”

Meeting psychosocial needs to improve health: a prospective cohort study

“…Even using the same assessment, individuals respond in different ways according to the professional undertaking the assessment [5], suggesting that there is no such thing as a 'value free' assessment of holistic need. Consequently, while policy has recognised the importance of routine, person-centred, psychosocial care [6], concerns relating to implementation barriers, the lack of clarity on the best way to identify needs and poor evidence of impact prevents widespread uptake [7,8]. Nevertheless, successful interventions exist.…”