Physicians’ Lived Experience of Breaking Bad News in Clinical Practice: Five Essentials of a Relational Process

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop deeper knowledge about physicians’ lived experiences of breaking bad news by identifying their common meanings and interrelatedness along with their potential alignment with process-oriented and relational aspects. Based on the methodology of descriptive phenomenology, in-depth interviews were conducted with 22 physicians from a wide variety of specialties. The participants were invited to freely reflect upon their experiences of breaking bad news by describing situations that had worked well and less well. Results showed that breaking bad news was fundamentally experienced as a relational process constituted by the five essentials of Becoming the bad messenger, Expecting the unpredictable, Being on stage, Professionally managing hope, and Mindfulness of the emotional relationship. In line with recent research, this study confirms that clinical communication involves much more than just delivering the message. However, it also contributes to existing knowledge by focusing on the phenomenology of physicians’ experiences, which enables deeper understanding of the medical profession and the relational process of breaking bad news. As such, our findings are important to enable broader learning in, for example, medical education and continuing courses for clinical staff.

‘You Also Have to Let People Go’—Effects of Formative Experiences with Dying and Death on Medical Trainees’ Attitudes

“…Corresponding to previous research, the challenging nature of delivering bad news was highlighted [5,15,35]. A particular challenge when delivering bad news is dealing with the hopes of patients and their relatives [36].…”

The influence of “bad news” and “neutral/good news” on patients' perception of physician empathy during oncology consultations

“…It could be proposed that patients' perception of their physician as less empathic after receiving bad news is an example of “shooting the messenger,” 2 or that the patient idealizes the physician after having received good news after a period of worry in anticipation of the visit. One explanation for the lower rating following a bad news consultation could be that the physician focuses on the message 18 and, as a result, pays less attention to the patient, which is counterproductive. For the patient, it is as important, if not more important, to be known as it is to know what is ahead.…”

Communication with cancer patients: the perspective of caregivers versus non-caregivers in Iran

“…Nevertheless, an Iranian study found, that only 32 (13.6%) of the medical staff had received training in delivering bad news, and a significant majority, 195 (83%), expressed the need for a course to develop this skill (Biazar et al, 2019). This highlights a clear gap in training and underscores the importance of providing further education in this area especially because clinical communication encompasses far more than the mere transmission of information (Bousquet et al, 2015;Matthews et al, 2019;Tranberg and Brodin, 2023).…”