2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-007-9101-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Picture, Archiving and Communication System in the Italian NHS: A Primer on Diffusion and Evaluation Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In PACS, medical images are collected from the imaging modalities, stored with their corresponding reports, and distributed to the referring physicians. Unlike many other clinical information systems, PACS can be considered a success story [11]; its benefits are considerable [12] and tangible on different levels, going from patients to management [13]. Yet, between the moment when the implementation is considered, and implementation success, there are four threats for a PACS-implementation project [14]:…”
Section: Bar Riers To the Implementation Of A Picture A Rchiving And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PACS, medical images are collected from the imaging modalities, stored with their corresponding reports, and distributed to the referring physicians. Unlike many other clinical information systems, PACS can be considered a success story [11]; its benefits are considerable [12] and tangible on different levels, going from patients to management [13]. Yet, between the moment when the implementation is considered, and implementation success, there are four threats for a PACS-implementation project [14]:…”
Section: Bar Riers To the Implementation Of A Picture A Rchiving And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other surveys from RezaeiHachesu, Pesianian and Mohammadian (2016) [12], Pare, Aubry, Lepanto and Sicotte (2005) [13], Mešanović et al (2010) [14] and Buccoliero, Calciolari, Marsilio and Mattavelli (2008) [15] have been conducted during the last 15 years, aiming to evaluate the degree of incorporation of RIS, PACS or both as one system in radiology departments and hospital facilities, to demonstrate the challenges of this incorporation, highlighting the clinical and financial or administration benefits (net benefits) at the same time. As perceived clinical benefits, improved efficiency in doctor's patient evaluation and patient's follow-up process, improved ability in decision making regarding patient care, easy consultation among different medical departments are mentioned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From the previous sections, our PISA framework combines the two pillars [ 1 ] PACS maturity (i.e., classifying PACS systems according to their stage of development and evolutionary plateau of process improvement) and [ 2 ] alignment (i.e., investments made in organizational dimension related to PACS should be balanced out in the organization in order to obtain synergizing benefits) and claims that both affect PACS performance of the hospital enterprise. Figure 1 provides a schematic sketch of our framework and depicts PACS maturity on the horizontal axis and organizational dimensions on the vertical axis.…”
Section: Defining Framework Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As investments in healthcare are generally large and mission critical in case of medical imaging technology, the need for structured implementation, measurement approaches, and holistic evaluation methods is expanding [ 1 3 ]. The fact that hospitals around the world are re-evaluating their picture archiving and communication system (PACS) implementations reflects this demand [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%