2020
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4443231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PiePlate: Proposing a visual peer-review overlay service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is insufficient but growing evidence of the increased value of sharing early outputs, both at the researcher and system level. Preprints can allow early feedback that could be considered as peer-review if a concept like PiePlate (multi-faceted open peer-review) became widely used [21]. There are also still serious barriers holding researchers back, like proposals to Australian Research Council funding being rejected because they have cited preprints [22].…”
Section: What Is the Future Of Preprints In Geochemistry?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is insufficient but growing evidence of the increased value of sharing early outputs, both at the researcher and system level. Preprints can allow early feedback that could be considered as peer-review if a concept like PiePlate (multi-faceted open peer-review) became widely used [21]. There are also still serious barriers holding researchers back, like proposals to Australian Research Council funding being rejected because they have cited preprints [22].…”
Section: What Is the Future Of Preprints In Geochemistry?mentioning
confidence: 99%