2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piercing the Milky Way: an all-sky view of the Orphan Stream

Abstract: We use astrometry, broad-band photometry and variability information from the Data Release 2 of ESA's Gaia mission (GDR2) to identify members of the Orphan Stream (OS) across the whole sky. The stream is traced above and below the celestial equator and in both Galactic hemispheres, thus increasing its visible length to ∼ 210 • equivalent to ∼ 150 kpc in physical extent. Taking advantage of the large number of RR Lyrae stars in the OS, we extract accurate distances and proper motions across the entire stretch o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
209
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(141 reference statements)
8
209
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equipped with this data set, we also showed that the stars in GD-1 are moving along the stream and do not have a significant velocity perpendicular to the stream. This is in contrast to the Orphan stream which shows a significant offset due to the effect of the LMC Koposov et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Equipped with this data set, we also showed that the stars in GD-1 are moving along the stream and do not have a significant velocity perpendicular to the stream. This is in contrast to the Orphan stream which shows a significant offset due to the effect of the LMC Koposov et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In particular, two streams, the ATLAS stream and the Aliqa Uma stream (at δ 2000 ∼ −35 • to −20 • in Figure 10), which were previously thought to be independent, are in fact a single stream from phase space information (S 5 et al in prep). 17 Here we treat Chenab and Orphan Stream separately although Koposov et al (2019) have shown that they are essentially one stream. We only show the stream targets in Chenab that are inside the DES footprint.…”
Section: Stream Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is to ensure that in the case that the proper motion of a stream was measured incorrectly, our target selection would still include some of the stream members. We choose a smaller range in µ φ 2 because the transverse motion of the stream (after solar reflex motion correction) is expected to be small except for cases where the streams have suffered large gravitational perturbations (see, e.g., the Orphan Stream; Koposov et al 2019;Erkal et al 2019).…”
Section: Stream Targets (P9-p7)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They discovered that the recently discovered Chenab Stream in the DES footprint (Shipp et al 2018) is actually part of the Southern extension of the Stream. The Chenab Stream and Grus II satellite are coincident in projection and proper motion coordinates (Koposov et al 2019, suggest there is a connection between the two substructures), however, Grus II is ∼10 kpc more distant than the Stream. The two brighter RRLs (V2 and V4) are at the correct distance to be Stream members and, in fact, they were pointed as likely Orphan Stream RRLs by Koposov et al (2019).…”
Section: Grus IImentioning
confidence: 91%