2020
DOI: 10.35633/inmateh-61-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pig Face Identification Based on Improved Alexnet Model

Abstract: Individual pig identification technology is the precondition of precise breeding. Taking pig face as the study point, this article puts forward a pig face identification method based on improved AlexNet model and explores the influence of training batch size on the performance of the model. Spatial attention module (SAM) is introduced in AlexNet model to compare the performance of the AlexNet model and the improved model on the training set and the validation set. The study shows that the improved AlexNet mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the efectiveness of the model proposed in this study, the solid-color cow face dataset was trained on the pig face recognition model proposed by Yan et al [28] and the sheep face recognition model proposed by Abu Jwade et al [27]. Te experimental results are shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To verify the efectiveness of the model proposed in this study, the solid-color cow face dataset was trained on the pig face recognition model proposed by Yan et al [28] and the sheep face recognition model proposed by Abu Jwade et al [27]. Te experimental results are shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The larger the value of AP, the better the detection model is. The formula for calculating AP is shown in Equation (3).…”
Section: Evaluation Indicators and Experimental Environment 231 Evalu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they require manual registration, which is both time-consuming and prone to error [2]. Radio frequency identification (RFID) is widely used in individual livestock identification [3]. However, it is more costly than traditional methods and is susceptible to interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are prone to cause serious physical damage to animals [ 4 ]. Electronic identification, using methods like Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags, are widely used in the field of individual livestock identification [ 5 ]. However, this method is costly and prone to problems such as unreadability or fraud.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%