Pilot project purgatory? Assessing automated vehicle pilot projects in U.S. cities

Abstract

Pilot projects have emerged in cities globally as a way to experiment with the utilization of a suite of smart mobility and emerging transportation technologies. Automated vehicles (AVs) have become central tools for such projects as city governments and industry explore the use and impact of this emerging technology. This paper presents a large-scale assessment of AV pilot projects in U.S. cities to understand how pilot projects are being used to examine the risks and benefits of AVs, how cities integrate these potentially transformative technologies into conventional policy and planning, and how and what they are learning about this technology and its future opportunities and risks. Through interviews with planning practitioners and document analysis, we demonstrate that the approaches cities take for AVs differ significantly, and often lack coherent policy goals. Key findings from this research include: (1) a disconnect between the goals of the pilot projects and a city’s transportation goals; (2) cities generally lack a long-term vision for how AVs fit into future mobility systems and how they might help address transportation goals; (3) an overemphasis of non-transportation benefits of AV pilots projects; (4) AV pilot projects exhibit a lack of policy learning and iteration; and (5) cities are not leveraging pilot projects for public benefits. Overall, urban and transportation planners and decision makers show a clear interest to discover how AVs can be used to address transportation challenges in their communities, but our research shows that while AV pilot projects purport to do this, while having numerous outcomes, they have limited value for informing transportation policy and planning questions around AVs. We also find that AV pilot projects, as presently structured, may constrain planners’ ability to re-think transportation systems within the context of rapid technological change.

A Taxonomy for Autonomous Vehicles Considering Ambient Road Infrastructure

“…Moreover, significant variations in such conditions have been observed in pilot AV projects in recent decades, as shown in Table 2. The interested reader can find many more recent projects in [62]. Therefore, it can be argued that a classification system that specifies the conditions under which the AV will realize its full potential will be beneficial.…”

Modelling And Simulating Age-Dependent Pedestrian Behaviours With An Autonomous Vehicle

“…In recent years, autonomous vehicles (AVs) have been tested on roads shared with other users e.g. pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers (McAslan et al 2021). In such environments, AVs adapt their navigation according to the traffic regulations such as stopping at a red light.…”

Multidimensional Analysis of Willingness to Share Rides in a Future of Autonomous Vehicles

“…At the same time, rapid advances are being made in transportation automation with the development of autonomous vehicles (AVs) offering the promise of driverless transport in the future ( 4 , 5 ). In fact, such driverless rides are now being offered in a couple of markets ( 6 , 7 ), ushering in a whole new era of mobility. The impediment to widespread adoption of ridehailing services is that the fare is rather prohibitive for regular/daily use of such services ( 8 ).…”