2006
DOI: 10.1310/q457-57lp-2387-671w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot Study of Once-Daily Simplification Therapy with Abacavir/Lamivudine/Zidovudine and Efavirenz for Treatment of HIV-1 Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Better adherence to once-daily versus twice-daily regimens remained statistically significant in all 11 sensitivity analyses conducted, after we excluded 1 individual study (data not shown). Ten studies [710, 1214, 16–18], which represented 2452 subjects, reported virologic end points. The meta-analysis found no significant difference in the proportion of subjects who achieved HIV RNA levels <50 copies/mL (+2.2%; 95% CI −1.2 to 5.5; P =.21) between recipients of once-daily versus twice-daily regimens (figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Better adherence to once-daily versus twice-daily regimens remained statistically significant in all 11 sensitivity analyses conducted, after we excluded 1 individual study (data not shown). Ten studies [710, 1214, 16–18], which represented 2452 subjects, reported virologic end points. The meta-analysis found no significant difference in the proportion of subjects who achieved HIV RNA levels <50 copies/mL (+2.2%; 95% CI −1.2 to 5.5; P =.21) between recipients of once-daily versus twice-daily regimens (figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 5 trials of treatment-naive subjects [912, 15] (1927 patients), use of once-daily regimens significantly improved adherence (+4.4%; 95% CI, 1.8%−7.0%; P < .001) and was associated with better virologic outcome (+5.7%; 95% CI, 0.7%−10.8%; P < .027). In contrast, among the 6 trials [7, 8, 13, 14, 16, 17] that involved treatment-experienced subjects (1102 patients), the adherence effect size was not statistically significant (+1.0%; 95% CI, −0.8 to 2.8; P =.29) and did not correspond to better virologic outcome (−0.7%; 95% CI, −5.2 to 3.8; P =.76).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation