1973
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(73)90049-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pion reaction cross sections and nuclear sizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uncertainties on the neutrino interaction and FSI models affect dσ/dQ 2 QE,p through the efficiency correction and are dominated by uncertainties on the resonance production axial mass parameter, pion absorption, and pion inelastic scattering. The uncertainties associated with hadron propagation through MINERvA are evaluated by shifting the pion and proton total inelastic cross sections by 10%, an uncertainty derived from external hadron production data [42][43][44][45]. This uncertainty affects proton tracking and PID efficiencies and acceptance for Q 2 QE,p > 0.8 GeV 2 .…”
Section: Fig 2: Comparisons Between Several Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainties on the neutrino interaction and FSI models affect dσ/dQ 2 QE,p through the efficiency correction and are dominated by uncertainties on the resonance production axial mass parameter, pion absorption, and pion inelastic scattering. The uncertainties associated with hadron propagation through MINERvA are evaluated by shifting the pion and proton total inelastic cross sections by 10%, an uncertainty derived from external hadron production data [42][43][44][45]. This uncertainty affects proton tracking and PID efficiencies and acceptance for Q 2 QE,p > 0.8 GeV 2 .…”
Section: Fig 2: Comparisons Between Several Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1.4) in the A resonance region (0.2-0.4GeV/c). Reaction cross sections of n on Pb and other nuclei down to Carbon have been measured at beam momenta between 0.71 and 2.00 GeV/c [5]. We shall see in the next section that they agree with a slightly refined version of Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…(1.4), provided one takes for R the uniform sphere radius (which is natural for geometrical models). The agreement is in fact better than for the much more complicated multiple scattering models [5]! However, the model fails definitely on the lowenergy side of the A-resonance, and for lighter nuclei also on the high-energy side (0.4-0.9 GeV/c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…e Gachurin and Bobchenko data also address charged pion scattering at high momentum. ey are joined by data from Allardyce et al [160]. At low momentum-in the region of the Δ resonance-data from Ashery et al [161] are adopted.…”
Section: Hadronic Interaction Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%