Pitfalls to avoid when introducing a cultural competency training initiative

Abstract

Medical Education 2010: 44: 613–620 Objectives In an effort to provide preventive advice, this paper aims to acknowledge what has not worked with regard to cultural competency initiatives. A successful cultural competency training initiative should have lasting impact on its participants in terms of long‐term, ideally permanent changes to attitudes, knowledge and skills resulting in the provision of optimum care, regardless of a patient’s cultural background. Legal mandates mean there is an assumed need for cultural competency curricula and training programmes for medical students and postgraduate medical trainees. However, policy and practice have bypassed ‘proof’ that such programmes are effective and result in better patient care. Often only positive results are reported, which may minimise the difficulties involved in programme implementation. Methods Utilising the example of a cultural competency initiative introduced into a postgraduate general surgery training programme, this paper discusses mistakes that were made during the implementation phase, particularly with regard to underestimating potential resistance by the trainees. Also presented are the lessons learned and efforts that were made to mitigate the problems that arose. None of what is discussed in this paper is new. However, the literature often does not discuss in detail the difficulties that can be or have been faced and how these obstacles can be adequately mitigated. Conclusions The glow of cultural competency training initiatives is fading in the light of higher expectations for an evidence base prior to acknowledgement that their introduction has had a positive impact. For these initiatives to advance, there needs to be a clear understanding of terms utilised, buy‐in and a long‐term commitment at both individual and organisational levels, and use of standardised and validated tools to measure outcomes. An understanding of potential pitfalls can help to advance cultural competency training to the next level, namely, a solid evidence base that justifies both an individual’s and an institution’s investment in this effort.

“Conversational Advice”: A mixed-methods analysis of medical residents’ experiences co-managing primary care patients with behavioral health providers

“…Residents may prefer to receive feedback and coaching during actual patient care, since it has an immediate value for them and their patients. Direct patient care has advantages over other interpersonal skills trainings, such as simulated patients and peer role-plays, since they may be viewed by trainees as more relevant [34,35]. Residency programs seeking to improve residents' interpersonal skills could benefit from IBHCs who in the United States can collect a professional fee for their service and provide proven, direct benefits to patients.…”

Cross-Cultural Training in Pediatric Residency: Every Encounter Is a Cross-Cultural Encounter

“…21–23 Examples include learner resistance (eg, residents feeling they either had or did not need these skills); time constraints; lack of faculty training or expertise; and institutional or system barriers to cross-cultural care and key leadership buy-in. One critical challenge is the lack of a broadly accepted definition of culture and what cultural competency training should be.…”

Creating a Sustainable Cancer Workforce: Focus on Disparities and Cultural Competence

“…(Chun 2010;Echeverri, Brookover et al 2010;Kamaka 2010;Wilkerson, Fung et al 2010;Crenshaw, Shewchuk et al 2011) These evolving tools will enrich the health care provider and enhance the relationship between diverse patients and the health care system. The next five years should be exciting as these tools, guides, and curricula emerge.…”