Planning for sustainable livelihood development in the context of rural South Africa: A micro-level approach

Abstract

In South Africa, different spheres of government (national, provincial and municipal) have different responsibilities with respect to rural planning and development. Rural development strategies, however, are predominately developed by national and provincial government (centralised planning) such as, for example, the 2009 Comprehensive Rural Development Programme (CRDP) and the 2018 draft National Spatial Development Framework (NSDF). These efforts from different spheres of the South African government are nevertheless still not having the desired effect in the development of sustainable rural livelihoods, according to the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform, similar to policies and efforts to implement them elsewhere in Africa. In addition to the appropriate planning and implementation scale, the spatial dimension of rural livelihood within the South African context also requires a specific understanding of the extreme differentiation of areas within 'rural South Africa'. Research regarding the impact of planning at village level (micro-level), as presented in this article, may provide valuable insights for realising sustainable rural livelihoods. This article aims, through an analysis of relevant literature, to examine the sustainable development discourse, in general, while addressing sustainable rural livelihoods and micro-level planning, in particular. The main research question concerns the way in which micro-level planning can contribute to ensuring sustainable rural livelihoods in South Africa. The article also discusses the complexity of 'rural' space and its understanding in the development planning framework of South Africa, providing the spatial context for sustainable rural livelihoods. Examples of micro-level planning approaches in Africa and South Africa are discussed to elucidate their applicability to sustainable rural livelihood development in South Africa. In conclusion, the analysis reveals that, while centralist policies are pursued in South Africa to support sustainable rural development, the actual realisation of sustainable rural livelihoods may well require micro-level development planning strategies. The implication for academics, planning professionals and politicians is that the support and development of microlevel sustainable rural livelihood planning should be pursued to attain the goals of the National Development Plan (2012) of eliminating poverty and to encourage citizens to be active in their own development.

Farmers’ Livelihood Adaptability in Rural Tourism Destinations: An Evaluation Study of Rural Revitalization in China

“…Moreover, Luo Xian Rong found that supportive initiatives and appropriate monitoring and management strategies are needed in the development of tourism to help local populations adapt to new conditions [41]. Attention should also be given to the lowest levels of government, as their task is to implement sustainable livelihood initiatives for people's lives [42].…”

Assessing the contribution of the Adhoc crop health surveillance tool on the food security and livelihoods of smallholder farmers in Uganda

“…The SLF focuses on poverty reduction and improves understanding of the livelihoods of the poor in the face of vulnerabilities and risk. It can facilitate the planning of development activities (Gibbens & Schoeman, 2020;Lax & Krug, 2013) or the assessment of the contribution of existing ones to sustainable livelihoods in various fields (Anadozie et al,…”

“…The SLF focuses on poverty reduction and improves understanding of the livelihoods of the poor in the face of vulnerabilities and risk. It can facilitate the planning of development activities (Gibbens & Schoeman, 2020; Lax & Krug, 2013) or the assessment of the contribution of existing ones to sustainable livelihoods in various fields (Anadozie et al, 2019; Arnaiz et al, 2018; Duncombe, 2007; Muringai et al, 2020). The critical components of the SLF include the vulnerability context, livelihood assets, transforming structures and processes, livelihood strategy, and livelihood outcomes (See Figure 2).…”

Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Livelihoods Diversification: Insights and Policy Implications for Rural Communities in South Africa

“…Connections between growth and conservation were established in the 1970s and early 1980s, culminating in the formulation of the World Conservation Strategy led by IUCN and other institutions (Kingmengsi et al, 2020). The World Conservation Strategy acknowledged the boundedness of natural resources and the necessity for guaranteeing their sustainable use (Gibbens & Schoeman, 2021). Acknowledgment of the significance of biodiversity conservation and its connections to global growth concerns has risen substantially during the roughly four and a half years since the 1972 Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment (Kingmengsi et al, 2019).…”

“…The fifth objective of the Bali Action Plan was the rise of a connection between endangered part administration and sustainable development and Endorsement, precisely recognizing that people living in or near endangered parts can support endangered area organizations if they feel they share properly in the reimbursements flowing from endangered areas, are appropriately rewarded for any misplaced right, and are taken into account in preparation and processes (Woyesa & Kumar, 2020). The rank of incorporating biodiversity conservation with sustainable economic improvement was further underscored in 1987 in the report issued by the World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (Gibbens & Schoeman, 2021). The report coined the term sustainable development and gave it its worldwide catchphrase level it now appreciates.…”