1959
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-3879(59)80021-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleural biopsy with the Vim-Silverman needle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hampson and Karlish (1961) believe that in the early stages of tuberculous effusions negative results may be obtained, since time has not been allowed for the formation of the characteristic tubercles; they suggest that if a negative biopsy report is obtained in a case of suspected tuberculous effusion a second biopsy should always be performed two weeks later. Another possible cause of a negative biopsy in these cases is previous antituberculosis chemotherapy (Misra and Sharma, 1959). However, in our series the first biopsy was performed prior to chemotherapy in all cases subsequently proved to have pulmonary tuberculosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Hampson and Karlish (1961) believe that in the early stages of tuberculous effusions negative results may be obtained, since time has not been allowed for the formation of the characteristic tubercles; they suggest that if a negative biopsy report is obtained in a case of suspected tuberculous effusion a second biopsy should always be performed two weeks later. Another possible cause of a negative biopsy in these cases is previous antituberculosis chemotherapy (Misra and Sharma, 1959). However, in our series the first biopsy was performed prior to chemotherapy in all cases subsequently proved to have pulmonary tuberculosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%