2022
DOI: 10.1108/bij-10-2021-0583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PMBOK, IPMA and fuzzy-AHP based novel framework for leadership competencies development in megaprojects

Abstract: PurposeEffective leaders have emerged as the cornerstone of project success. The major purpose of this paper is to propose a framework to categorize and prioritize leadership competencies for project managers in megaprojects.Design/methodology/approachIn the first stage, this study utilizes PMBOK 6th Edition, IPMA ICB 4.0 frameworks to develop a hierarchy-based four clusters of leadership competencies. In the second stage, a Fuzzy-AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) approach was employed to prioritize the leaders… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Chang's extent analysis method, a triangular fuzzy number is used for dealing with uncertainties and expressing linguistic evaluations of experts [133][134][135]. In addition, triangular fuzzy numbers are characterized by their wide applicability in similar civil engineering problems [136][137][138][139] and relative simplicity in modeling and calculation [140,141].…”
Section: Fanpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Chang's extent analysis method, a triangular fuzzy number is used for dealing with uncertainties and expressing linguistic evaluations of experts [133][134][135]. In addition, triangular fuzzy numbers are characterized by their wide applicability in similar civil engineering problems [136][137][138][139] and relative simplicity in modeling and calculation [140,141].…”
Section: Fanpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of uncertainty or in-confidence in the milieu surrounding managers can create a sense of unease and difficulty in most individuals (Kumanan et al, 2006;Afshar & Zolfaghar Dolabi, 2014). Determining the criteria that one would be able to use in order to make certain decisions is thus considered a fundamental problem in a way that distinguishing and setting distinction between right and wrong is always a source of dispute and debate (Faisal et al, 2022). The Traditional and common response to such uncertainties is mostly divided on the basis of a two-dimensional and value-based in which events are divided to good or bad AND/OR possible and impossible (Tadic et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…emphasizes the importance of human experience in interpreting and validating BDA results. According toFaisal et al (2023), human experts could navigate the complex and ambiguous situations that algorithms may encounter. They can apply their expertise and intuition to identify hidden indicators of fraud that may not be captured by automated systems alone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%