2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point A vs. HR-CTV D90 in MRI-based cervical brachytherapy of small and large lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Harmon et al demonstrated in their study sufficient tumor coverage with lower doses to OARs in HR-CTV D 90 vs. Point A plans in the small lesion group. These improvements were not seen in the large lesion group, indicating a lesser dosimetric advantage of HR-CTV D90 compared to Point A planning when the cervical lesion is >25 cm 3 [14,15]. However, in our study, as expected coverage of the HR-CTV improves when the plan is optimised to a D90 of 100% of prescription dose rather than prescribing to the A points.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Harmon et al demonstrated in their study sufficient tumor coverage with lower doses to OARs in HR-CTV D 90 vs. Point A plans in the small lesion group. These improvements were not seen in the large lesion group, indicating a lesser dosimetric advantage of HR-CTV D90 compared to Point A planning when the cervical lesion is >25 cm 3 [14,15]. However, in our study, as expected coverage of the HR-CTV improves when the plan is optimised to a D90 of 100% of prescription dose rather than prescribing to the A points.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Moreover, there were significantly higher doses with HR-CTV D 90 and D 100 (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in HR-CTV D 90 dose parameters in the large lesion group (>25 cm 3 ), demonstrating that there was no dosimetric advantage of HR-CTV D 90 over Point A in this group [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Although point A plans met the suggested OAR dose limits, they reported that 15% and 17% of patients had genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities of grades 3-4, showing the dosimetric advantages of CT planning with the volumebased high-dose rate in providing significant HR-CTV while reducing OAR doses [18]. In another study by Harmon et al [13], twenty-eight fractions obtained from sixteen cervical cancer patients treated with MRI-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Lesions were divided into small (<25 cm 3 ) or large (>25 cm 3 ) volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Harmon et al (21) assessed the difference between 2D plans normalized to Point A and 3D target (HR-CTV) optimization under MRI guidance for 3-catheter IC treatment. The results showed that for patients with small tumor volume (HR-CTV !25 cm 3 ), the rectum, bladder, and sigmoid colon doses would be effectively lowered with the 3D target optimization method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%