1992
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.46.3391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarized neutron reflection as a probe of magnetic films and multilayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that PNR is a very precise tool to measure accurate average magnetic moment specially for magnetic thin films, as it is insensitive to thin film dimensions. [42] Figure 4 shows PNR patterns of Fe-N thin films deposited using HiPIMS(a) and dc-MS(b) prepared at varying R N2 . The obtained PNR patterns were fitted using a computer program based on the Parratt formalism [43] and the average magnetic moment was calculated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that PNR is a very precise tool to measure accurate average magnetic moment specially for magnetic thin films, as it is insensitive to thin film dimensions. [42] Figure 4 shows PNR patterns of Fe-N thin films deposited using HiPIMS(a) and dc-MS(b) prepared at varying R N2 . The obtained PNR patterns were fitted using a computer program based on the Parratt formalism [43] and the average magnetic moment was calculated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows s͑Q͒ calculated for an In layer with the "local" and "nonlocal" field profiles; details on the formalism are available in Ref. 19. The simulations indicate that the difference between spin asymmetries for the local and nonlocal approaches can be of the order of 10%, which is feasible for state-of-the-art PNR facilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The solutions of the particle wave equations in these slabs are implemented in a matrix formalism that calculates the spin-dependent neutron reflectivities of magnetically noncollinear media as a function of the neutron wave vector transfer Qϭ4 sin( )/ . 37 The influence of absorption ͑imaginary part of b i ) on calculations of the reflectivity is negligible in the wave vector range used in the present PNR experiments. To our knowledge, no analytical expressions exist that describe the influence of both the nuclear and the magnetic roughness of noncollinear systems on PNR simulations in a similar way as the expressions derived by Névot and Croce for GIXR.…”
Section: To Obtain the Reflectivities R(↑↑) R(↓↓) R(↑↓) And R(↓↑)mentioning
confidence: 88%