2015
DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1061398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy Considerations on Facebook: Agendas, Coherence, and Communication Patterns in the 2011 Danish Parliamentary Elections

Abstract: A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 2 and Public Management ABSTRACT Given the importance of issue competition in a West European context and the growing use of Facebook in elections, this paper studies how politicians use Facebook to shape the campaign agenda. We analyze the issues addressed in 6388 Facebook posts by candidates in the Danish 2011 parliamentary election. A limited share of Facebook updates is dedicated to issues. TheFacebook agenda did not respond to standings in the polls, nor to the media ag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other themes were ‘behind the scene’ pictures of her putting on her shoes or getting her hair done before media appearances. The style of both candidates, which was highly personalised, was in line with a study by Van Dalen et al (2015) which held that the content on the social media pages of Danish politicians was more about the personalisation of the candidate and relationship management than building a policy profile. One could say it was intimacy at a distance.…”
Section: Social Media In Danish Election 2019 – a Party And Candidatesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Other themes were ‘behind the scene’ pictures of her putting on her shoes or getting her hair done before media appearances. The style of both candidates, which was highly personalised, was in line with a study by Van Dalen et al (2015) which held that the content on the social media pages of Danish politicians was more about the personalisation of the candidate and relationship management than building a policy profile. One could say it was intimacy at a distance.…”
Section: Social Media In Danish Election 2019 – a Party And Candidatesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Despite these advantages over other platforms, empirical evidence, with few exceptions (Enli & Skogerbø, ), shows that Twitter is scarcely ever used in an interactive way by politicians (Glassman, Straus, & Shogan, ; Golbeck, Grimes, & Rogers, ; Graham et al, ; Grant et al, ; Larsson & Moe, ; Small, ). Although much research has focused on factors explaining the presence or frequency of policy elites' activity on social media (Nulty et al, ; Obholzer & Daniel, ; Van Dalen, Fazekas, Klemmensen, & Hansen, ), less attention has been paid on what may be explaining candidates' style of use.…”
Section: Candidates On Social Media: Engaging Versus Broadcasting Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ud over at undersøge, hvilke kanaler politikerne bruger under valgkampen, så er der også underdelinger af studier, som undersøger hvad politikerne bruger sociale medier til. Hoffman, Suphan og Meckel (2016) finder, at politikere i Schweiz hovedsageligt bruger sociale medier til selvfremstilling, hvilket bekraeftes af et norsk studie (Enli og Skogerbø 2013) samt et dansk studie, som ydermere finder lav tilstedevaerelse af politiske emner i indholdet, som deles på sociale medier i forhold til indhold med henblik på selvfremstilling (Van Dalen et al 2015). I et lignende studie også af Hoffmann og Suphan (2017) denne gang med udgangspunkt i Tyskland finder de frem til en lignende konklusion.…”
Section: Politisk Afsenderunclassified
“…Dette kan skyldes, at faenomenet oftest foregår via hashtags på Twitter, hvilket er en platform, der ikke er populaer i den danske befolkning og kun for nyligt har opnået popularitet indenfor politisk kommunikation. Ampofo, Anstead og O'Loughlin (2011) finder, at dual screen-publikummet i England hjaelper hinanden med at fortolke valgkampens detaljer, hvilket derved slører graensen mellem ekspert og almen borger i den offentlige debat. Vaccari og Valeriani (2018) har foretaget en større undersøgelse af dual screening i otte vestlige lande inklusiv Danmark.…”
Section: Offentlig Aktørunclassified