2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy design for forest carbon sequestration: A review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Forest ecosystems and their associated understory act as important carbon sinks, providing habitats for wildlife [1,2] and promoting economic and social services to societies [3,4]. The sequestration of carbon and CO 2 by forest biomass and soils plays a major role in managing greenhouse gas emissions [5] providing a low-cost opportunity in climate policies [6]. The estimation of tree and shrub biomass in the Mediterranean Basin also contributes to better understanding fire behavior, which constitutes one of the most relevant disturbances as well as being a source of greenhouse gas emission to the atmosphere [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest ecosystems and their associated understory act as important carbon sinks, providing habitats for wildlife [1,2] and promoting economic and social services to societies [3,4]. The sequestration of carbon and CO 2 by forest biomass and soils plays a major role in managing greenhouse gas emissions [5] providing a low-cost opportunity in climate policies [6]. The estimation of tree and shrub biomass in the Mediterranean Basin also contributes to better understanding fire behavior, which constitutes one of the most relevant disturbances as well as being a source of greenhouse gas emission to the atmosphere [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gains go beyond private individual owners, extending to a wider social value, creating a welfare-economic optimal solution. Some countries compensate the value of carbon sequestration through policies such as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD) and Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) [44]. Seed harvesting provides value to private individuals and society as a whole.…”
Section: Implication On Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although offsetting potentially generates new revenue streams and opportunities for poor communities in the Global South (Jindal, Swallow, and Kerr 2008;Thomas et al 2010;Osborne and Shapiro-Garza 2018), it often comes with trade-offs, injustices, unintended consequences, or obstacles to implementation that tend to be insufficiently acknowledged by proponents (Muradian et al 2013;Cavanagh and Benjaminsen 2014;Osborne 2015;Leach and Scoones 2015a;Corbera and Schroeder 2017;Edstedt and Carton 2018;Fischer and Hajdu 2018). Persistent concerns about the permanence and additionality of carbon offsets, moreover, raise questions about the environmental integrity of this particular mitigation approach (Galik and Jackson 2009;Erickson, Lazarus, and Spalding-Fecher 2014;Cames et al 2016;Gren and Zeleke 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%