2015
DOI: 10.1002/hep.27954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphisms in melanoma differentiation‐associated gene 5 are not associated with clearance of hepatitis C virus in a European American population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In parallel, the islet cohort was genotyped for the rs3747517 SNP (Supplementary Table S1). The results from this genotyping were in line with the previously published strong linkage disequilibrium with rs19907609163031.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In parallel, the islet cohort was genotyped for the rs3747517 SNP (Supplementary Table S1). The results from this genotyping were in line with the previously published strong linkage disequilibrium with rs19907609163031.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Further, haplotypes at IFIH1 encoding His at position 843 and Thr at position 946 were reported to correlate with the resolution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) 28 . Notably, we found IFIH1 H843/T946 was very rare in our data, consistent other recent reports 48 , 49 . Thus, at the population level, the impact of the common risk haplotype (IFIH1 T946/R843 ) upon response to viral challenge and autoimmune disease risk is likely to be important; whereas the impact of the rare IFIH1 H843/T946 haplotype would be negligible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In regard to IFIH1 rs3747517, which was embedded within an activator protein 1 (AP-1) binding site, no significant relation between rs3747517 and SLE susceptibility was observed in patients from Brazil 20 . However, ethnic differences have been seen in the allele distributions of both rs1990760 and rs3747517 in Europeans, Asians and Africans 20 , 24 , 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%