2012
DOI: 10.4236/oje.2012.24023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyplacophora species richness, composition and distribution of its community associated with the intertidal rocky substrate in the marine priority region No. 32 in Guerrero, Mexico

Abstract: The coast of Acapulco is located within the Marine Priority Region No. 32 (MPR No. 32) at the State of Guerrero, Mexico. The National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity has stated the lack of information on marine species that live there, among which are the Class Polyplacophora. This study aimed to: 1) determine species richness, 2) the community structure based on the representative families, 3) estimate the density, 4) locate species distribution, 5) determine their degree of occurrence (h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…De hecho, seis de las 11 especies encontradas son comunes en el Salvador y Costa Rica Jörger et al, 2008 Garza et al, 2012), y dos especies, Acanthopleura echinata y Chiton cumingsii, se distribuyen hasta el sur de Chile (Araya & Araya, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…De hecho, seis de las 11 especies encontradas son comunes en el Salvador y Costa Rica Jörger et al, 2008 Garza et al, 2012), y dos especies, Acanthopleura echinata y Chiton cumingsii, se distribuyen hasta el sur de Chile (Araya & Araya, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…In the BIVALVIA Class, MYTILIDAE Family also was reported by [11] and [20] as the most abundant, which differs from that reported for Acapulco by [22] [24], who found the CHAMIDAE Family to be the most abundant. In the POLYPLACOPHORA Class CHITONIDAE Family was also reported to be the best represented in abundance by [18] [22] [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of the substrate was classified as: 1) high: when the substrate remains virtually unchanged by the impact of waves, 2) middle: when the impact of the waves does not change the configuration of the substrate but there is rock movement, 3) low: when the site configuration is changed by the impact of waves, most of the The wave exposure was classified as: 1) high: when the wave hits the substrate in a free manner, usually the sites that have this type of waves are outside of the protection of barriers such as bays or hooks, 2) middle: when the impact of the wave on the substrate is hindered by barriers or smoothing, as can occur at sites that are in front of the entrance of bays or at a distance from a wall of hooks, it also happens in places where subtidal rocky substrate emerges or is shallow and reduces the direct impact of the waves to the substrate, 3) low: when the wave does not directly hit the substrate, since the sites are protected by different types of barriers [36].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%