2021
DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7612/2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

POOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN CLINICAL SCREENING AND UNIVERSAL PRE-PROCEDURE SARS-CoV-2 PCR TESTING PRIOR TO ENDOSCOPY

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Khorrami Minaei et al ( 31 ) performed a retrospective review to assess the usefulness of clinical screening and pre-procedure PCR testing for the identification of high risk patients for SARS-CoV-2 infection. They included a consecutive cohort of 361 patients undergoing endoscopy at a tertiary teaching hospital between 22nd April and 22nd June 2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khorrami Minaei et al ( 31 ) performed a retrospective review to assess the usefulness of clinical screening and pre-procedure PCR testing for the identification of high risk patients for SARS-CoV-2 infection. They included a consecutive cohort of 361 patients undergoing endoscopy at a tertiary teaching hospital between 22nd April and 22nd June 2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Study 2: In hospitalized and ambulatory individuals, 83% reported feeling safer because of the testing strategy. 35 HCW reassurance or anxiety (3 observational studies)…”
Section: Summary Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified 2 studies that reported on patients' attitude and anxiety regarding endoscopy during the early phases of the pandemic. 35,36 In 1 survey study, patients felt that on-site testing was important but, despite testing, they did not feel reassured. In another study of hospitalized and ambulatory individuals, 83% reported feeling safer because of the testing strategy.…”
Section: Summary Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%