2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poor Brain–Tumor Interface–Related Edema Generation and Cerebral Venous Decompensation in Parasagittal Meningiomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it is not recommended to perform direct ligation and resection of the superior sagittal sinus without assessing whether the local drainage vein is well compensated, even if preoperative imaging indicates type III. When preoperative symptoms of venous hypertension are under consideration, along with imaging indicating a scarcity of side drainage veins around the tumor, characterized by small venous vessel diameters and a singular drainage pattern, or when peritumoral brain edema (PTBE) coincides with poor brain-tumor interface-related edema (PIRE) ( 14 , 15 ), there is a likelihood of insufficient local compensatory drainage veins. Hence, reconstruction of the sinus cavity warrants consideration ( Figure 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it is not recommended to perform direct ligation and resection of the superior sagittal sinus without assessing whether the local drainage vein is well compensated, even if preoperative imaging indicates type III. When preoperative symptoms of venous hypertension are under consideration, along with imaging indicating a scarcity of side drainage veins around the tumor, characterized by small venous vessel diameters and a singular drainage pattern, or when peritumoral brain edema (PTBE) coincides with poor brain-tumor interface-related edema (PIRE) ( 14 , 15 ), there is a likelihood of insufficient local compensatory drainage veins. Hence, reconstruction of the sinus cavity warrants consideration ( Figure 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, preoperative imaging of the sinus does not *Simpson grade II resection is defined as electrocoagulation only with complete or partial preservation of the sinus wall to avoid affecting the collateral veins. drainage pattern, or when peritumoral brain edema (PTBE) coincides with poor brain-tumor interface-related edema (PIRE) (14,15), there is a likelihood of insufficient local compensatory drainage veins. Hence, reconstruction of the sinus cavity warrants consideration (Figure 4).…”
Section: Assessment Identification and Protection Of The Sagittal Sin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether a correlation exists between peritumor edema and meningioma grade is controversial. The etiology of peritumor edema remains unclear, and peritumor venous congestion or ischemia has become the mainstreamview ( 24 ). Some studies have demonstrated that peritumor edema is an important feature of atypical meningioma or malignant meningioma, whereas other studies have also noted that a relationship exists between peritumor edema and meningioma grade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that PIRE was highly associated with venous decompensation and worst neurological outcome within the consequent three to six months. Despite the fact that, their topic was the contribution of venous drainage insufficiency to edema formation they stressed the role of brain tumor interface and venous network [14].…”
Section: Yin Et Al Published a Study Of Edema In Parasagittal Meningiomas Focusing On Venous Compression Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%