2022
DOI: 10.1111/apa.16320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poor postnatal growth in preterm infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst the weight gain ratio method identified 72 (92.3%) infants with growth failure, the z ‐score and the growth velocity methods 2 both identified a much lower number of infants with inadequate growth: 57 (73%) and 53 (67.9%) respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whilst the weight gain ratio method identified 72 (92.3%) infants with growth failure, the z ‐score and the growth velocity methods 2 both identified a much lower number of infants with inadequate growth: 57 (73%) and 53 (67.9%) respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have now also added the weight growth ratio, as suggested by Manzar 2 . In Table , we compare the number and percentage of infants with poor growth, as defined separately by these three different methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some researchers use standard deviation, some use z-score, while others use growth velocity. We recently suggested using a triple method of growth assessment in preterm infants [3], combining growth velocity (GV), weight gain ratio (WGR), and delta z-score (∆Z). The triple method was derived from the reports of Patel et al and Rochow et al [4,5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%