2000
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/22.4.669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population structure, vertical distribution and diel migration of Sagitta setosa (Chaetognatha) in the south-western part of the Black Sea

Abstract: The population structure of Sagitta setosa from the south-western part of the Black Sea was examined between May 1994 and December 1996. In addition, the vertical distribution and diel vertical migration of S.setosa were studied for juveniles (≤5 mm) and adults (>5 mm) in April 1995, September 1995 and June 1996. The population structure studies showed that a new generation was introduced in September. Breeding was most intensive from June to November, indicated by the frequency of small-sized individuals. Die… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar Q 10 values were obtained by Vidal (1980c) and Ikeda et al (2001). ) was also found in the southwestern Black Sea in summer (Vinogradov et al 1995), autumn (Yuneva et al 1999, Besiktepe & Unsal 2000, Svetlichny et al 2006) and during the phytoplankton rich winter-spring period (Vinogradov et al 1992c).…”
Section: Respiration Ratesupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar Q 10 values were obtained by Vidal (1980c) and Ikeda et al (2001). ) was also found in the southwestern Black Sea in summer (Vinogradov et al 1995), autumn (Yuneva et al 1999, Besiktepe & Unsal 2000, Svetlichny et al 2006) and during the phytoplankton rich winter-spring period (Vinogradov et al 1992c).…”
Section: Respiration Ratesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Similar Q 10 values were obtained by Vidal (1980c) and Ikeda et al (2001). ) was also found in the southwestern Black Sea in summer (Vinogradov et al 1995), autumn (Yuneva et al 1999, Besiktepe & Unsal 2000, Svetlichny et al 2006) and during the phytoplankton rich winter-spring period (Vinogradov et al 1992c).However, local densities of Calanus euxinus population in the Black Sea may be even higher, because preadults and adults usually ascend to subsurface layers at night and aggregate in the OMZ during daytime During all seasons late development stages of Calanus euxinus migrate in the morning to the OMZ where they reduce respiration rate and stop feeding (Vinogradov et al 1992a,b). CV and adults began to feed again during the night and ascend to the upper layers (Besiktepe et al 2005).…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As reported from earlier studies that the surface waters of the southern Black Sea are always poor in terms of nutrients during the seasons when these waters are stratified (Basturk et al, 1994;Bingel et al, 1993;Codispoti et al, 1991). The variations in nutrient concentration are mainly due to sub-surface nutricline and mixing process (Besiktepe et al, 2000;Yayla et al, 2001). In the spring-autumn period of 1995-1996, average concentrations in the euphotic zone ranged regionally and seasonally from 0.16 to 1.5 μM for TNOx (mainly NO 3 ) and from 0.03 to 0.35 μM for phosphate (Yilmaz et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This study constitutes a first attempt to compare the Nansen, Juday and WP2 nets, which were (and probably still are) used mostly in the Black Sea (see Kovalev et al, 1977;Konsulov, 1990;Besiktepe & Unsal, 2000;Vinogradov et al, 1992;Stefanova et al, 2012;Arashkevich et al, 2014) and the Baltic Sea (see Hernroth, 1987;Johansson et al, 1993;Flinkman et al, 1998;Ojaveer et al, 1998;Kornilovs et al, 2001;Mollmann et al, 2005). The effort was based on tests performed for a variety of parameters (abundance, biomass-total and per size classes-, taxonomic composition), for nets with the same shape and mouth diameter, but with different mesh size (Juday with 150, 180 and 200 µm mesh size), and for nets with different shape, mouth diameter and length, but the same mesh size (Juday-200 vs WP2-200), as well as for nets with different shape and mesh size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%