“…This study constitutes a first attempt to compare the Nansen, Juday and WP2 nets, which were (and probably still are) used mostly in the Black Sea (see Kovalev et al, 1977;Konsulov, 1990;Besiktepe & Unsal, 2000;Vinogradov et al, 1992;Stefanova et al, 2012;Arashkevich et al, 2014) and the Baltic Sea (see Hernroth, 1987;Johansson et al, 1993;Flinkman et al, 1998;Ojaveer et al, 1998;Kornilovs et al, 2001;Mollmann et al, 2005). The effort was based on tests performed for a variety of parameters (abundance, biomass-total and per size classes-, taxonomic composition), for nets with the same shape and mouth diameter, but with different mesh size (Juday with 150, 180 and 200 µm mesh size), and for nets with different shape, mouth diameter and length, but the same mesh size (Juday-200 vs WP2-200), as well as for nets with different shape and mesh size.…”