1995
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1995.9944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore Size Distributions in Microporous Membranes II. Bulk Characterization of Track-Etched Filters by Air Porometry and Mercury Porosimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, the average pore size and the largest pore size of a track-etched polymeric membrane with a cylindrical pore structure and a very narrow pore size distribution, representing the ideal conditions for measuring the largest pore size, are essentially the same. 32) However, the average pore size and the largest pore size of a metallic membrane with an asymmetrical pore structure 33) are unambiguously different. One important consideration is that these studies 34) focused on the discrepancies among the average pore size, the largest pore size, and pore size distribution as measured by either mercury porosimetry or capillary flow porosimetry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the average pore size and the largest pore size of a track-etched polymeric membrane with a cylindrical pore structure and a very narrow pore size distribution, representing the ideal conditions for measuring the largest pore size, are essentially the same. 32) However, the average pore size and the largest pore size of a metallic membrane with an asymmetrical pore structure 33) are unambiguously different. One important consideration is that these studies 34) focused on the discrepancies among the average pore size, the largest pore size, and pore size distribution as measured by either mercury porosimetry or capillary flow porosimetry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se observa nuevamente un acuerdo razonable con los valores nominales propuestos por el fabricante, aunque en algunos casos las desviaciones son importantes, especialmente respecto a los datos de porosidad. Estos valores de la porosidad se han comparado con los procedentes de diversas técnicas de caracterización, (7,9,10). Los resultados de dicha comparación se presentan en la Figura 4, para un conjunto representativo de las membranas analizadas.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Similar analysis using curve-fitting instead of mode value to determine average pore size, has been used by other researchers [30].…”
Section: Sem Imaging and Pore Size Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%