Positioning Accuracy in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using a Mask System With Added Vacuum Mouth Piece and Stereoscopic X-Ray Positioning

The purpose of this study was to evaluate setup accuracy and quantify random and systematic errors of the BrainLAB stereotactic immobilization mask and localization system using kV on‐board imaging. Nine patients were simulated and set up with the BrainLAB stereotactic head immobilization mask and localizer to be treated for brain lesions using single and hypofractions. Orthogonal pairs of projections were acquired using a kV on‐board imager mounted on a Varian Trilogy machine. The kV projections were then registered with digitally‐reconstructed radiographs (DRR) obtained from treatment planning. Shifts between the kV images and reference DRRs were calculated in the different directions: anterior‐posterior (A‐P), medial‐lateral (R‐L) and superior‐inferior (S‐I). If the shifts were larger than 2 mm in any direction, the patient was reset within the immobilization mask until satisfying setup accuracy based on image guidance has been achieved. Shifts as large as 4.5 mm, 5.0 mm, 8.0 mm in the A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively, were measured from image registration of kV projections and DRRs. These shifts represent offsets between the treatment and simulation setup using immobilization mask. The mean offsets of 0.1 mm, 0.7 mm, and −1.6 mm represent systematic errors of the BrainLAB localizer in the A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively. The mean of the radial shifts is about 1.7 mm. The standard deviations of the shifts were 2.2 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.6 mm in A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively, which represent random patient setup errors with the BrainLAB mask. The BrainLAB mask provides a noninvasive, practical and flexible immobilization system that keeps the patients in place during treatment. Relying on this system for patient setup might be associated with significant setup errors. Image guidance with the kV on‐board imager provides an independent verification technique to ensure accuracy of patient setup. Since the patient may relax or move during treatment, uncontrolled and undetected setup errors may be produced with patients that are not well‐immobilized. Therefore, the combination of stereotactic immobilization and image guidance achieves more controlled and accurate patient setup within 2 mm in A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions.PACS numbers: 87.56.‐v, 87.56.Da

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging

Ali

Tubbs

Hibbitts

et al. 2010

The spatial accuracy of two frameless, linear accelerator‐based systems for single‐isocenter, multitarget cranial radiosurgery

Ezzell

2017

Single‐isocenter, multitarget cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is more efficient than using an isocenter for each target, but spatial positioning uncertainties can be magnified at locations away from the isocenter. This study reports on the spatial accuracy of two frameless, linac‐based SRS systems for multitarget, single‐isocenter SRS as a function of distance from the isocenter. One system uses the ExacTrac platform for image guidance and the other localizes with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). For each platform, a phantom with 12 target BBs distributed up to 13.8 cm from the isocenter was aligned starting from five different initial offsets and then imaged with the treatment beam at seven different gantry and couch angles. The distribution of the resulting positioning errors demonstrated the value of adding a 1‐mm PTV margin for targets up to about 7–8 cm from the isocenter. For distances 10 cm or more, the CBCT‐based alignment remained within 1.1 mm while the ExacTrac‐based alignment differed by up to 2.2 mm.

Cost‐effective immobilization for whole brain radiation therapy

Rubinstein

Ingram

Anderson

et al. 2017

To investigate the inter‐ and intra‐fraction motion associated with the use of a low‐cost tape immobilization technique as an alternative to thermoplastic immobilization masks for whole‐brain treatments. The results of this study may be of interest to clinical staff with severely limited resources (e.g., in low‐income countries) and also when treating patients who cannot tolerate standard immobilization masks. Setup reproducibility of eight healthy volunteers was assessed for two different immobilization techniques. (a) One strip of tape was placed across the volunteer's forehead and attached to the sides of the treatment table. (b) A second strip was added to the first, under the chin, and secured to the table above the volunteer's head. After initial positioning, anterior and lateral photographs were acquired. Volunteers were positioned five times with each technique to allow calculation of inter‐fraction reproducibility measurements. To estimate intra‐fraction reproducibility, 5‐minute anterior and lateral videos were taken for each technique per volunteer. An in‐house software was used to analyze the photos and videos to assess setup reproducibility. The maximum intra‐fraction displacement for all volunteers was 2.8 mm. Intra‐fraction motion increased with time on table. The maximum inter‐fraction range of positions for all volunteers was 5.4 mm. The magnitude of inter‐fraction and intra‐fraction motion found using the “1‐strip” and “2‐strip” tape immobilization techniques was comparable to motion restrictions provided by a thermoplastic mask for whole‐brain radiotherapy. The results suggest that tape‐based immobilization techniques represent an economical and useful alternative to the thermoplastic mask.