2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-04619-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Filtering Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the assumption that the source signal and the noise are uncorrelated, it has been shown in [2,3] that (4) can be further decomposed into a MVDR beamformer followed by a single channel Wiener filter, which operates at the output of the beamformer:…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Under the assumption that the source signal and the noise are uncorrelated, it has been shown in [2,3] that (4) can be further decomposed into a MVDR beamformer followed by a single channel Wiener filter, which operates at the output of the beamformer:…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common-used criterion for speech enhancement is the mean-square error (MSE), leading to the Multichannel Wiener filter. This optimal multichannel MSE filter has been shown in [2,3] that can be factorized into a Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) beamformer, followed by a single channel Wiener postfilter. However, the MSE distortion of the signal estimate is essentially not the optimum criterion for speech enhancement [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to further alleviate the non-correlated noise on different channels, a fequency-domain Zelinski post-filter [20] is applied to the MMI-beamformed speech, which can be estimated bŷ…”
Section: Post-filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%