2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08099-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-implantation clinical cost analysis between transcutaneous and percutaneous bone conduction devices

Abstract: Introduction Bone conduction devices (BCD) are effective for hearing rehabilitation in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss or single-sided deafness. Transcutaneous bone conduction devices (tBCD) seem to lead to fewer soft tissue complications than percutaneous BCDs (pBCD) but have other drawbacks such as MRI incompatibility and higher costs. Previous cost analyses have shown a cost advantage of tBCDs. The purpose of this study is to compare long-term post-implantations costs between p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 22 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?