2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior Iris-claw Aphakic Intraocular Lens Implantation in Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique has the advantage that the IOL is located behind the iris and therefore the negative influence on the corneal endothelium is less than with anterior chamber IOLs. This hypothesis was recently confirmed by Gonnermann et al They have shown that the posterior enclavation of the iris-claw IOL has no significant influence on the corneal endothelial cell count[ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This technique has the advantage that the IOL is located behind the iris and therefore the negative influence on the corneal endothelium is less than with anterior chamber IOLs. This hypothesis was recently confirmed by Gonnermann et al They have shown that the posterior enclavation of the iris-claw IOL has no significant influence on the corneal endothelial cell count[ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Somit scheint die retropupillare Fixation einer Irisklauen-Linse eine interessante Alternative. Mehrere Studien haben bereits gute visuelle und refraktive Ergebnisse bei geringer Komplikationsrate aufgezeigt [7,[15][16][17][18][19][20]. Der Endothelzellverlust nach retropupillarer Implantation einer Irisklauen-Linse wurde jedoch bisher nicht in einem größeren Patientenkollektiv untersucht.…”
unclassified
“…The preoperatively disenclaved haptic was marked with a vicryl 6-0 thread and placed in balanced salt solution with ofloxacine to avoid contamination. Following this, acetylcholine chloride 1% was injected in the anterior chamber and a new Verisyse IOL was implanted retropupillary at a separate, unaffected enclavation site on the iris stroma as previously described 18. Individual modifications of the performed surgical procedure are summarised in table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereby, a disenclavation might occur spontaneously because of insufficient tissue grasping, or despite adequate enclavation after significant trauma 16 17. Because of potential complications, such as rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and vitreous haemorrhage, a dislocated posterior iris-claw IOL requires replacement9 17 18 or re-enclavation 11 12. In this regard, the long-term endothelial cell loss, as a measure for perioperative trauma, after re-enclavation, and after uneventful implantation, was found to be comparable 19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%