2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.10.309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative stability of conventional bimaxillary surgery compared with maxillary impaction surgery with mandibular autorotation for patients with skeletal class II retrognathia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Japanese patients tend to exhibit higher mandibular retrusion and labial inclination of the anterior teeth, steeper mandibular planes, and a greater tendency toward high angle facial types 6) . High angle facial types possess a shorter ramus height, which is more difficult to maintain during mandibular advancement, primarily because this height will most likely increase 8) . In contrast to low angle facial type cases, high angle facial types require a significant increase in ramus height.…”
Section: Orthognathic Surgical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Japanese patients tend to exhibit higher mandibular retrusion and labial inclination of the anterior teeth, steeper mandibular planes, and a greater tendency toward high angle facial types 6) . High angle facial types possess a shorter ramus height, which is more difficult to maintain during mandibular advancement, primarily because this height will most likely increase 8) . In contrast to low angle facial type cases, high angle facial types require a significant increase in ramus height.…”
Section: Orthognathic Surgical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operative stress arising from osteotomy of the mandibular ramus and repositioning of the distal fragments of the mandible (e.g., the body of the mandible) may lead to postoperative development or exacerbation of progressive condylar resorption in patients with maxillary prognathism, VME, and significant deformation of the condyle [ 18 20 ]. Therefore, maxillary osteotomy alone (without mandibular osteotomy) is recommended to prevent relapse of the mandible [ 21 , 22 ]. The maxilla is repositioned posteriorly with impaction to improve the facial appearance and occlusion, whereas the mandible undergoes reactionary counter-clockwise rotation during postero-superior repositioning, to achieve occlusion with the maxilla ( Fig 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Recently, a comparative study on the subject of skeletal stability 1 year after surgery considered between isolated Le Fort I osteotomy and conventional 2-jaw surgery in patients with similar amounts of forward movement of point B indicated that the former was more stable than the latter. 20 A few studies have evaluated condylar remodeling and resorption 17 or skeletal relapse [21][22][23] following isolated Le Fort I osteotomy. Here, the degree of skeletal relapse was compared between wire fixation and mini-plate fixation after isolated maxillary surgery or between bimaxillary surgery and isolated maxillary surgery in patients with different surgical movements at point B.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the relationship between mandibular autorotation and maxillary impaction or positional changes of the mandibular condyle after mandibular autorotation have been covered, 17,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25] the positional changes of displaced condyles following isolated Le Fort I osteotomy have not been widely discussed. Moreover, there is no report detailing the correlation between condylar displacement and the surgical movement inherent in mandibular autorotation for isolated maxillary surgery in patients with risk factors for pICR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%