1994
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199405000-00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posttransplant Bladder Recovery—a Prospective Randomized Trial of Two Techniques of Ureteric Anastomosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Online suppl. Table 3 includes details on the excluded studies [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. We included 1 quasi-randomized controlled trial (Zargar et al [34]) and 2 prospective nonrandomized controlled trials (Pacovsky and Navratil [35] and Zomorrodi and Bahluli [36]).…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online suppl. Table 3 includes details on the excluded studies [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. We included 1 quasi-randomized controlled trial (Zargar et al [34]) and 2 prospective nonrandomized controlled trials (Pacovsky and Navratil [35] and Zomorrodi and Bahluli [36]).…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority improve within 3 months of transplantation. An average increase in excess of 50% in both bladder capacity and maximal flow rate is seen (11). Unfortunately, it is difficult to predict bladder function after transplantation in an oliguric patient.…”
Section: Lower Urinary Tractmentioning
confidence: 99%