Potato sprouts as a potential source of solanidine glycoalkaloids for nutritional studies

Tuśnio, Anna; Taciak, Marcin; Trawczynski, C; Barszcz, Marcin; Skomiał, J.; Pastuszewska, B.

doi:10.22358/jafs/65931/2013

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Under normal condition, Szczurek et al [13] did not record any observed changes in final BW and weights of liver, abdominal fat and SI for broilers offered diet containing 8 and 32 g/kg of whey protein concentrate (80.35% protein, 5.86% lactose) as substitute for soyabean meal at 24 days. The same conclusions were revealed that relative weight of some visceral organs involving GIT, gizzard , liver, pancreas and caecum were not changed by feeding 5% potato protein concentrate at 35 days [14]. Moreover, indices (g/kg) of heart, liver, pancreas, gizzard , proventriculus and abdominal fat were not affected compared to control at 42 days in broilers fed starter diet supplemented with soy protein concentrate at 4, 8 and 12% [34].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 63%

“…However, using 12% soy protein concentrate in early broilers' diet during starter phase for 10 days increased gizzard and ileum weights and decreased the relative length of duodenum and jejunum as well as decreased the weight and length of jejunum at 10 days [16]. In general, IPC in current study may protect the weight, length and density of digestive system parts and other measured organs compared to control during stressful periods of FR via positive modification of gut histomorphology, enzymatic activity of intestine [35], nutrients digestibility [14], microflora composition [16] and immune defense system [13].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 78%

“…It is well known all proteins are important nutrients in formation and renewal of body tissues and are mainly present as hormones and enzymes. Many protein concentrates especially whey [13], potato [14] and soy [15] concentrates are incorporated in diet at desirable levels and used as alternative to antibiotics. These products proved their biological efficacy by increasing the productive profile, gut development, nutrient digestibility, immune response [13,15] and supporting overall health via increased growth of beneficial microfloa population in digestive system of broiler chickens [16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Changes in Body Weights and Gross Anatomy of Physiological Organs of Feed-Restricted Broilers Fed Diet with Organic Selenium and Iraqi Protein Concentrate 6×1

Kareem,

Abdulsahib Al-Shammari

2024

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many physiological organs are increasingly susceptible to stressors arising from environmental management or nutritional factors. Thus, the aim of this research was to evaluate the influence of two proposed strategies of feed restriction (FR) along with dietary supplementation of organic selenium (OS) and Iraqi protein concentrate 6×1 (IPC) on body weight (BW) and cross anatomy of selected visceral organs in broiler chickens. Totally, 420 one day-old chicks Ross 308 were used and randomly distributed into 7 treatments (60 chicks per treatment) with 3 equal replicates each. In control (T1), birds were fed ad libitum without dietary additives and birds in treatment of T2, T3 and T4 were fed quantitative FR (40%) without feed additives, with adding 0.8 mg OS and 25 g IPC per kg of diet, respectively whereas the birds in treatments of T5, T6 and T7 were fed temporal FR (12 hours/day) without feed additives, with adding 0.8 mg OS and 25 g IPC per kg diet, respectively. All birds were reared for 35 days and from 2nd till 3th week of age all birds were exposed to FR regimes with feed additives and then were freely fed without dietary additives from 4th-5th week of age in the compensatory growth phase. 3 unsexed birds closed to the average BW of experimental treatments were chosen from each replicate in treatment (no=9 per treatment) and were used for evaluation cross anatomy. The results revealed that T5, T6 and T7 maintain (p≤0.05) BW at 3th and 5 weeks. Bigger relative weight of liver (p≤0.05) was in T3 and T4 at 3th weeks with recorded reduction in abdominal fat was in T3, T4 and T6 at 6 weeks. No differences among all groups regarding to relative weights of adrenal gland, heart, pancreas, kidneys and lungs and relative length of small and large intestines and density of large intestine at 3 and 5 weeks. Generally, temporal FR followed by quantitative FR successed to maintain relative weight and lengths of each particular gastrointestinal tract (GIT) part starting from esophagus till rectum in relation to weight of BW or GIT and length of GIT depending on feed supplement. In conclusion, each treatment has its own specific mode of action to induce significant change or stability without deleterious impact on relative weights and lengths of organs especially in feed restricted diets with supplementation of OS or IPC after termination FR and compensatory growth at 3 and 5 weeks, respectively.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 63%