2021
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potency of BNT162b2 and mRNA‐1273 vaccine‐induced neutralizing antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome‐CoV‐2 variants of concern: A systematic review of in vitro studies

Abstract: Summary BNT162b2 and mRNA‐1273 are two types of mRNA‐based vaccine platforms that have received emergency use authorization. The emergence of novel severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS‐CoV‐2) variants has raised concerns of reduced sensitivity to neutralization by their elicited antibodies. We aimed to systematically review the most recent in vitro studies evaluating the effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA‐1273 induced neutralizing antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern. We searched Pub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
(212 reference statements)
5
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Emerging viral variants may need higher antibody levels for the same level of neutralising activity 17 ; a sensitivity analysis therefore assumed 2-to 5-fold greater levels would be required, and compared three populations in order of vulnerability: 40-year-old females without long-term health conditions, 60-year-old males without long-term health conditions, and 80-year-old males with long-term health conditions. If 5-fold higher antibody levels were required, for a 40-year-old female without long-term health conditions or prior infection, the estimated time from second dose to 42 versus 42*5=210 ng/ml reduced from 250 to 50 days with ChAdOx1 and from 600 to 300 days with BNT162b2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging viral variants may need higher antibody levels for the same level of neutralising activity 17 ; a sensitivity analysis therefore assumed 2-to 5-fold greater levels would be required, and compared three populations in order of vulnerability: 40-year-old females without long-term health conditions, 60-year-old males without long-term health conditions, and 80-year-old males with long-term health conditions. If 5-fold higher antibody levels were required, for a 40-year-old female without long-term health conditions or prior infection, the estimated time from second dose to 42 versus 42*5=210 ng/ml reduced from 250 to 50 days with ChAdOx1 and from 600 to 300 days with BNT162b2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, PBNA has been shown to correlate well with other assays measuring the neutralization antibodies, including the plaque reduction neutralization test [33], the microneutralization assay, and the ELISA assay [34]. Reports of neutralizing antibody levels in vaccinated individuals [7,[35][36][37][38] and their effectiveness against various variants are emerging [39]. Recent data [35] suggests that there might be a time-dependent improvement in the neutralizing efficacy of antibodies against variants, which might be due to the expansion and evolution of antibodies in the germinal centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…More limited real-world effectiveness data is available for the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine 2-4 . Continued emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants potentially threatens the success of vaccination programs, particularly as in vitro experiments suggest reduced neutralisation activity of vaccine-elicited antibodies against emerging variants 5,6 . Of particular concern is the Delta variant (B.1.617.2), which has caused sharp rises in infections in many countries, including some with relatively high vaccination coverage such as the UK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%