2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.05.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potent and selective small-molecule human urotensin-II antagonists with improved pharmacokinetic profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore reasonable to hypothesize that this interaction may be accentuated with GSK1562590 due to the presence of the more basic pyrrolidine residue compared with the less basic morpholine in GSK1440115. Indeed, comparison of numerous pairs of pyrrolidine/morpholine analogs having otherwise identical chemical structures has demonstrated that without exception, the pyrrolidine analogues are 10–1000‐fold more potent than their morpholine counterparts (McAtee et al ., 2008). In addition, a set of analogues in this chemical series with basic moieties other than pyrrolidine and morpholine exhibited a strong correlation between the basicity of the nitrogen functionality and UT binding affinity (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore reasonable to hypothesize that this interaction may be accentuated with GSK1562590 due to the presence of the more basic pyrrolidine residue compared with the less basic morpholine in GSK1440115. Indeed, comparison of numerous pairs of pyrrolidine/morpholine analogs having otherwise identical chemical structures has demonstrated that without exception, the pyrrolidine analogues are 10–1000‐fold more potent than their morpholine counterparts (McAtee et al ., 2008). In addition, a set of analogues in this chemical series with basic moieties other than pyrrolidine and morpholine exhibited a strong correlation between the basicity of the nitrogen functionality and UT binding affinity (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%