Potential cost-effectiveness of using a collagen-containing dressing in managing diabetic foot ulcers in the UK

Guest, Julian F.; Singh, Heenal; Vowden, Peter

doi:10.12968/jowc.2018.27.3.136

Cited by 11 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Study setting and cohort. Study settings were diverse and accounted for South America, [41,55] Australia, [42] Canada, [43] China, [59] Europe [47,49,[51][52][53][54]56] and North America [44-46, 48, 50, 57, 58] (Table 2). Patients across all age groups 18 years and over were captured.…”

Section: Economic Evaluation Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[17] The societal perspective was taken by Cárdenas et al [41] and Redekop et al [54] The perspective of the healthcare system was taken in six studies [42,43,50,55,57,59] and the payers perspective was taken in five [45,46,49,56,58] (Table 2). Both the societal and payers perspectives were taken by Guo et al [48] Perspective was not reported in five studies, [44,47,[51][52][53] however Ortegon et al [51] discussed some results from the policy and clinical perspective.…”

Section: Economic Evaluation Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most economic evaluations assessed adjuncts to standard wound care strategies. [41,47,[54][55][56] Two studies assessed becaplermin gel plus good wound care (GWC) [52,58] and two studies assessed hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). [43,48] The overall wound care strategy was compared in three studies, each comparing what was locally considered as standard versus optimal wound care.…”

Section: Economic Evaluation Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One-year [41,45,54,58] and five-year time horizons were most common. [42,44,53,55,56,59] The longest time horizon was 12-years by Chuck et al [43] Short time horizons were taken by Gilligan et al [46] and Guest et al [47] of three and four months respectively. Two time horizons were taken in two papers, Tesar et al [56] used 5-and 10-year time horizons and Lobmann et al [49] used 20-week and 100-week time horizons.…”

Section: Economic Evaluation Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[58] Seven studies used a decision-tree analytical model. [41,43,44,47,48,50,59] The Markov model was the most common choice and was used in ten studies. [42,45,46,49,[51][52][53][54][55][56] Costs included.…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Economic evaluations considering costs and outcomes of diabetic foot ulcer infections: A systematic review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a severe complication of diabetes and particularly susceptible to infection. DFU infection intervention efficacy is declining due to antimicrobial resistance and a systematic review of economic evaluations considering their economic feasibility is timely and required. Aim To obtain and critically appraise all available full economic evaluations jointly considering costs and outcomes of infected DFUs. Methods A literature search was conducted across MedLine, CINAHL, Scopus and Cochrane Database seeking evaluations published from inception to 2019 using specific key concepts. Eligibility criteria were defined to guide study selection. Articles were identified by screening of titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review before inclusion. We identified 352 papers that report economic analysis of the costs and outcomes of interventions aimed at diabetic foot ulcer infections. Key characteristics of eligible economic evaluations were extracted, and their quality assessed against the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Results 542 records were screened and 39 full-texts assessed for eligibility. A total of 19 papers were included in the final analysis. All studies except one identified cost-saving or cost-effective interventions. The evaluations included in the final analysis were so heterogeneous that comparison of them was not possible. All studies were of "excellent", "very good" or "good" quality when assessed against the CHEERS checklist.

show abstract

Section: Economic Evaluation Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Economic Evaluation Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Economic Evaluation Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Economic Evaluation Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Economic evaluations considering costs and outcomes of diabetic foot ulcer infections: A systematic review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Recent advancements in natural polymers‐based self‐healing nano‐materials for wound dressing

Anand,

Sharma,

Sharma

2024

J Biomed Mater Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field of wound healing has witnessed remarkable progress in recent years, driven by the pursuit of advanced wound dressings. Traditional dressing materials have limitations like poor biocompatibility, nonbiodegradability, inadequate moisture management, poor breathability, lack of inherent therapeutic properties, and environmental impacts. There is a compelling demand for innovative solutions to transcend the constraints of conventional dressing materials for optimal wound care. In this extensive review, the therapeutic potential of natural polymers as the foundation for the development of self‐healing nano‐materials, specifically for wound dressing applications, has been elucidated. Natural polymers offer a multitude of advantages, possessing exceptional biocompatibility, biodegradability, and bioactivity. The intricate engineering strategies employed to fabricate these polymers into nanostructures, thereby imparting enhanced mechanical robustness, flexibility, critical for efficacious wound management has been expounded. By harnessing the inherent properties of natural polymers, including chitosan, alginate, collagen, hyaluronic acid, and so on, and integrating the concept of self‐healing materials, a comprehensive overview of the cutting‐edge research in this emerging field is presented in the review. Furthermore, the inherent self‐healing attributes of these materials, wherein they exhibit innate capabilities to autonomously rectify any damage or disruption upon exposure to moisture or body fluids, reducing frequent dressing replacements have also been explored. This review consolidates the existing knowledge landscape, accentuating the benefits and challenges associated with these pioneering materials while concurrently paving the way for future investigations and translational applications in the realm of wound healing.

show abstract

Natural Products as Wound Healing Agents

Khalil

Abou-Zekry

Sami

et al. 2021

Wound Healing Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Potential cost-effectiveness of using a collagen-containing dressing in managing diabetic foot ulcers in the UK

Cited by 11 publications

References 23 publications

Economic evaluations considering costs and outcomes of diabetic foot ulcer infections: A systematic review

Economic evaluations considering costs and outcomes of diabetic foot ulcer infections: A systematic review

Recent advancements in natural polymers‐based self‐healing nano‐materials for wound dressing

Natural Products as Wound Healing Agents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About