2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.01.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential for Osseous Regeneration of Platelet-Rich Fibrin—A Comparative Study in Mandibular Third Molar Impaction Sockets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 6 ] This retrospective review demonstrated that preventative treatment of localized osteitis could be accomplished using a low cost, autogenous, soluble, biologic material, PRF, and that PRF enhanced third molar socket healing/clot retention and greatly decreased the clinical time required for postoperative management of localized osteitis. [ 6 ] Since then, many studies have evaluated the use of LPRF and PRF to facilitate implant placement and periapical surgeries,[ 37 38 ] revascularization procedures,[ 39 ] perforation repair, and also bone regeneration in oral and maxillofacial region. [ 38 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 6 ] This retrospective review demonstrated that preventative treatment of localized osteitis could be accomplished using a low cost, autogenous, soluble, biologic material, PRF, and that PRF enhanced third molar socket healing/clot retention and greatly decreased the clinical time required for postoperative management of localized osteitis. [ 6 ] Since then, many studies have evaluated the use of LPRF and PRF to facilitate implant placement and periapical surgeries,[ 37 38 ] revascularization procedures,[ 39 ] perforation repair, and also bone regeneration in oral and maxillofacial region. [ 38 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 6 ] Since then, many studies have evaluated the use of LPRF and PRF to facilitate implant placement and periapical surgeries,[ 37 38 ] revascularization procedures,[ 39 ] perforation repair, and also bone regeneration in oral and maxillofacial region. [ 38 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resorptive remodeling of the alveolar ridge commonly occurs following tooth extraction. This process may be beneficial in fixed orthodontic treatment of patients with severe crowding [17][18][19]. Adequate volume of alveolar bone is a prerequisite for successful orthodontic tooth movement during space closure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the available RCTs and controlled studies comparing L‐PRF to unassisted socket healing reported a benefit when L‐PRF was applied in terms of early (up to 8 weeks) (Alzahrani, Murriky & Shafik, ; Hauser, Gaydarov, Badoud, Vazquez & Bernard, ) and late (up to 16 weeks) (Temmerman, Vandessel, Castro, Jacobs & Teughels, ; Varghese, Manuel & Kumar, ) radiographic bone fill and horizontal/vertical alveolar preservation (Appendix S3), faster soft tissue healing, reduced pain and reduced post‐extraction sequelae (Marenzi, Riccitiello, Tia, Lauro & Sammartino, ; Ozgul, Senses, Er, Tekin & Tuz, ; Singh, Kohli & Gupta, ; Suttapreyasri & Leepong, ; Temmerman et al., ; Varghese et al., ; Zhang, Ruan, Shen, Tan & Huang, ). Moreover, the use of L‐PRF in third molars’ extractions has been associated with an improvement in second molars’ periodontal parameters (Kumar, Prasad, Ramanujam, Dexith & Chauhan, ) and a nearly tenfold decrease in the incidence of osteomyelitis compared to natural healing (Hoaglin & Lines, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%