“…This is the reason why the geoengineering characteristics depend on the scale of the project are often approximated with different techniques and computer modelling approaches [14][15][16][17]. Producing 3D conceptual shallow geothermal potentials [18,19], utilizing GIS [20][21][22], spatial data analysis [23][24][25], applying numerical technique [26][27][28][29], integrated of different geophysical prospecting techniques such as magnetotelluric [30][31][32][33][34], gravity [33,35], seismic [31,33], and electrical resistivity [31,36,37], as well as evident geological characteristics [38,39] are some of the carried efforts in Spain, Chile, Pakistan, Iran, India, Nigeria, Indonesia, Denmark, China, Thailand, Italy, Taiwan, Finland and Japan. However, simulating the geothermal resources using numerical techniques due to complexity of the model preparation (natural state properties of the rocks and geothermal system), description of the realistic problem and evaluation of the results as well as inability in providing any insight into generalizations is a very time-consuming task that demands extensive experience.…”