2016
DOI: 10.1142/s021830131641007x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power counting and Wilsonian renormalization in nuclear effective field theory

Abstract: Effective field theories are the most general tool for the description of low energy phenomena. They are universal and systematic: they can be formulated for any low energy systems we can think of and offer a clear guide on how to calculate predictions with reliable error estimates, a feature that is called power counting. These properties can be easily understood in Wilsonian renormalization, in which effective field theories are the low energy renormalization group evolution of a more fundamental -perhaps un… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent reviews and references addressing this problem can be found, e.g., in Refs. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The Lagrangian of any consistent EFT includes all local interactions allowed by the underlying symmetries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reviews and references addressing this problem can be found, e.g., in Refs. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The Lagrangian of any consistent EFT includes all local interactions allowed by the underlying symmetries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike its higher energy cousin chiral-EFT, the power counting of EFT(/ π) is well understood and unambiguous [15]. EFT(/ π) has had great success in describing PC (See Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daniel Phillips' evenhanded account at Chiral Dynamics 2012 [41] and van Kolck's more recent review [42]); some additional notable contributions include Refs. [15,24,29,30,32,[43][44][45][46]. This is not just stamp-collecting or a philosophical question which potentially exposes the soft underbelly of χEFT and the credibility of its error assessments, but which is "otherwise" of little practical consequence.…”
Section: Rationale: Consistency Issues In Efts With Shallow Bound Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%